Scott Rose vs. parental rights.

Just about two days ago, I stumbled across this web page and found a fellow heteroactivist under attack. I decided to wade into this fray and test one of my Achilles questions against his most eloquent attacker.

I asked Mr. Scott Rose...

Do you support how some sex education classes for grades K thru 6 welcome schoolchildren INTO the glbt community WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents?

His response was...

"Enlightened human beings of whatever sexual orientation constantly interrelate with one another, as sexual relations are far from being the only thing of importance in life. For example, a heterosexual man with an interest in sailing could very well go out on a lake one day in a sailboat with a lesbian couple and the lesbian couple's children. The way you have phrased your question, Carl Rowan Morris, conspicuously implies that LGBT adults around children in the ages of K through 6th grade would commit child rape on those children. The direct evidence suggests that Catholic priests are far more likely that non-priest LGBT adults to rape children. Anti-gay bigot adults, on the other hand, absolutely should not be permitted to endanger their children's welfare by teaching them irrational anti-gay hate. The children taught that hate by their parents are the ones who become anti-gay bullies in school. That bullying besides damaging the gay victims also hinders the bully from receiving the best possible education. So to answer your question, yes, it is terrible for anti-gay bigot parents to hinder their offsprings' enlightened integration into the contemporary world by teaching them homophobia, the irrational fear of gay human beings, which you have expressed with your stupid question."

Mr Rose's is so fancy and so eloquent as he accuses me of implying child rape, WHILE he admits his support of violating the civil rights of parents that won't support the sexual actions of the glbt community. He calls speaking to a child about ENTERING the gay community, behind the backs of that child's parents, an "enlightened integration into the contemporary world."

Wow. That was some of the smoothest poison I've ever heard.

Isn't Mr. Scott Rose himself guilty of bigotry when he openly advocates the violation of another person's civil rights after he labels that person an "anti-gay bigot"? Isn't it possible to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying homosexuality? Does Mr. Rose hate those who don't support the concept of a man having sex with another man (anti-gay bigotry according to him) so much that he advocates taking their children away from them? Look at the paragraph marked May 27th at 3:17pm. How will he respond to my question..."How are you better than "anti-gay bigots" when you openly admit your support of violating a parent's right to supervise their child's education?

Again, my evidence is here.

The gay mouse that roared.

I'm stunned by the clarity and quality of this article written by an ex-gay man.

Viral video report.

More gender denial.

Well. Here it is again. People denying the obvious differences between the human male and the human female. American culture is taking yet another step away from sexual sanity and teaching children that they are the gender that they think they are, regardless of what's between their legs.

Where do I buy stock in a company that provides materials and curriculum for homeschooling because, when more people find out about what's being taught to their kids, homeschooling is going to explode.

"Genderealist"

Just like I constructed the word "heteroseparatist" to free those who embrace sexual normalcy from being marginalized, I created the word "genderealist" to counteract the derisive term "heterosexist." (How crazy are human beings going to become in my lifetime?!)

A couple in Canada are refusing to tell anyone the gender of their child. Wow. Okay.

Now, these people have every right to withhold this information from people, and I'm not disputing their parental rights to do so, but why would they do this? Is this the kind of World that gays, feminists, and liberals want? Is ignoring gender the tie that binds the gays and the feminists? What's next? Will I be thrown in jail for saying "Miss" or "Sir" in the future? Am I going to live the life of Harrison Bergeron?

Story here and here.

Voters of Minnesota to be heard in 2012.

How does the 6,000+ year-old definition of marriage violate the civil rights of gay people? I don't get it. Every member of the glbt community in the United States of America grew up in a country where marriage is defined as being between one man and one woman, yet now gays are claiming/believing that such a definition is a violation of their civil rights. What? What did you say? You're equating your sexual behavior to race? Waaaa? Are you crazy!

Now, the people of Minnesota get to vote on a Constitutional amendment that defines marriage. How could anybody be upset at that? Story here, here and here.

"Don't say gay" to gradeschoolers.

Whenever I ask someone who belongs to the glbt community to denounce how some in the gay community want to speak to children about entering their lifestyle, without the consent of that child's parents, they almost always go ballistic.

Then they come at me with an avalanche of propaganda designed to distract me from the fact that they won't disavow the glbt violation of the civil rights of some parents. How odd. How strange. It seems that homopocrisy runs very deep. How did I wake up in a country where a person would openly admit their desire to pull children into homosexuality? If a person is born gay, they will still be gay when they are 18, so why do some gays insist on access to children without parental consent?

Well. It looks like Tennessee is waking up to reality and taking a stand against those who would come at children behind the backs of their parents about sexual matters. How could any sane person have a problem with that? Doesn't a person prove that they are a danger to children when they support doing an end-run around the civil rights of that child's parents? WHO CAN DISPUTE THAT?

Story here.

Hatred FROM the glbt community.

I don't know much about this guy, but he speaks with great clarity. I hear so much propaganda that I'm now at a point where I'm almost shocked by clarity. Though I walk through the valley of homofascism, I shall not fear, for I am with the Lord.

"Transgendered"

99.99% of human beings are born male or female. (Then there are the Caster Semenya types of the World.) Some people reject their own genital and decide that they want to go from male to female or vice versa. This decision is a rejection of sexual sanity and a clear indication of gross parental failure. One of the greatest current examples of this is Chaz Bono, who just doesn't want to be a girl anymore.

Yesterday I found an article that stunned me with its clarity and courage. And, it was written by a psychiatrist (which should silence my recent batch of homofascist hecklers). Dr. Keith Ablow's article is here.

Dear "Voice of Reason."

Dear Voice of Reason, (VoR for short) I've seen your last two comments and I've decided to clear up a matter before I accept any more of your posts. I think that I've figured out something about you.

Because of my experiences with comments about my posts, I've developed a process of figuring out key pieces of information by formulating a key question.

I must preface my question to you with the following statement; I hereby denounce speaking to any child about the Lord Jesus Christ and I denounce recruiting children into the heterosexual lifestyle, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

Now. That being said. VoR, can you match me by stating that you won't support gays that wish to tell children that joining the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? Because if you can't, that will tell me how far your support for the glbt community goes.

I know how some people like to throw up a smoke screen when they're dodging a simple question so I'll make it clear that I'm not talking about the mere mention of the existence of homosexuals in the anti-bullying classes taught to schoolkids. I'm specifically talking about those in the gay community that wouldn't hesitate to tell a child that entering the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

So, Voice of Reason, this is the question I'm presenting to you. Will you denounce how some adults in the glbt community will tell a child/person under the age of 16, that it okay for them to BE gay, WITHOUT the consent of their parents?

You like true marriage? Your fired!

I haven't heard of anyone being fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage, yet I do hear of people being fired and harassed for supporting God's definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Oh but wait! It's Canada where homofascism was legitimized by legalizing same-sex "marriage." The members of the glbt community want me to believe that legalizing homosexual "marriage" in my country won't affect my marriage, and then I read this. If I'm fired for standing for true marriage, won't that adversely effect mine?

Child-endangering-homofascism.

When I first started this blog, I thought that nobody would believe me if I said that the glbt community was after children. My plan was to simply gather evidence to support my point whenever my heteroseparatist philosophy was challenged. But, even when I present the facts of homofascist behavior, there are still those that refuse to accept the horror of the doctrine of the gay community; the pursuit of the minds and hearts of children, WITHOUT the consent of their parents.

I guess I was naive to think that those who supported the glbt community, beyond the understandable point of standing against the bullying of gays, would be shocked back into reality when I showed how some/most gays would go so far as to pursue children with the full knowledge that that child's parents did NOT want their child being taught that homosexuality was okay.

But yesterday, I found the second greatest example of child-endangering-homofascism that I've ever seen. I read it three times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating. Read how this homosexual homofascist plans to proudly and knowingly violate the civil rights of parents by approaching children about homosexuality without parental consent. He even supports raising boys to have sex with men when they grow up! I wonder at what age he considers a boy old enough to have sex with?

"...I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f****** men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously ***** ***. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up ********** to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby. .."

Story here, here, and here.

The Peter Vidmar case.

How does gay "marriage" affect mine? I could get fired for supporting true marriage. Story here and (as of 17 May 2011) here.

Hero reporter Daniel Miller.

I just had to post this.

Long, but interesting, pro-hetero video.

Homofascists are bullying the Boy Scouts.

Gay is behavior, not race. To swap out the word,"Black" for "gay" is wrong because the color of a person's skin is morally benign and a person's sexual conduct is never morally benign.

The Boy Scouts acknowledge God and his laws. Boy Scouts are; trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. I memorized these twelve words, in this sequence, over 38 years ago.

A person cannot embrace sexual sin and be reverent. Therefore, all those who wish to embrace sexual sin cannot be a part of the BSA. Leave it to anti-Christ, "gay activists," to want to destroy the Boy Scouts of America for their reverence for God's laws.

Story here.

Viral video report.

DON'T DRINK ANYTHING WHILE WATCHING THIS VIDEO. (Unless you like cleaning off your computer screen.)

What if he was a polygamous judge?

Do I have the same right that "gay activists" do when it comes to word-replacement-arguments?

What if Judge Walker believed in polygamy, was in a long term sexual relationship with multiple women, was about to retire, and worked in Salt Lake City, Utah?

If, under the above mentioned conditions, he then threw out a Constitutional Amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman... how would his actions be seen? Wouldn't the personal gain of his decision be an obvious disqualifier?

“It is important to emphasize at the outset that we are not suggesting that a gay or lesbian judge could not sit on this case,” the group’s attorneys said in their motion, which was submitted to the district court. “Rather, our submission is grounded in the fundamental principle, reiterated in the governing statute, that no judge ‘is permitted to try cases where he has an interest in the outcome.’ ”

My supporting evidence is here.

Liberals and same-sex "marriage."

The man's argument could be better, but he still makes some valid points about the redefinition of marriage. Especially about how interracial marriage always existed, and homosexual "marriage" never has.

Upcoming rumble?

Well beloved readers it's happened again. A homosexual is mad at me for using my freedom of speech, (that I have paid for via income tax) to denounce an act of arson against the property of a gay man. I'm not making this up.

This little heckler calls himself, "Absolutely Not Annonymous." He rejects Jesus Christ, has sex with men, and he's mad at me. He's been accusing me of some wanting to "wish gays out of existence," and other homophobic beliefs. He apparently hates my hate-free refusal to support the glbt community and his gay lifestyle. His attacks have become really hard to understand, so I'm going to give him his own post so we can fight one-on-one. As always, I will allow no one but him to comment on this post. I know how heckler-class gays like to group-attack.

I'm making him choose a shorter name so we can talk. I think that that's fair. I'm not going going to cite such a long name every time I address him here and in future posts.

So... "Absolutely Not Annonymous," until you face me here, your comments won't be posted. So identify yourself, tell me what you've chosen for your shorter name... and BRING IT!

Osama Bin Laden is dead.

He was killed by United States Navy Seals in Pakistan. Justice has been done. Brief account of raid here.

Twitter account of raid here.

Royal Wedding.

The concept of marriage comes from God. And He says that it is to be between one man and one woman. The significance of the Word of God can be seen here also.

Viral video report.

A big surprise at 1:22.

What heteroseparatism ISN'T about.

About four days ago, an anonymous commenter posted a link to this story on this blog, as if to imply that I supported this type of activity against gays.

It seems that no matter what I say, homofascists will not accept the fact that a person can refuse to support the glbt community, and NOT be motivated by hate, fear, or ignorance. I denounced proactive violence against the glbt community from day one in my Internet manifesto AND this blog; my proof is here.

I vehemently denounce this act of arson against the gay man in this news story, yet I still don't believe that a person can be born gay, and I support the concept/definition that a marriage is between one man and one woman.

"Don't Say Gay" in Tennessee schools.

This is Tennessee Senator Stacey Campfield who is proposing a bill to protect schoolchildren in his state from anti-hetero propaganda. Senator Campfield believes that a child's parents should choose how to talk to their children about the glbt lifestyle and, of course, he's receiving hate mail from homofascists.

"...Campfield said his bill aims to stop gay-rights activists from pushing their agenda in the classroom. He cited children's programming that taught homosexuality and said "several" teachers have informed him that they're already teaching the material. .."

"...But Campfield said his bill won't prevent educators from addressing bullying and that families should ultimately decide when their kids should receive sex education. .."

More info on this heroic heteroactivist here.

Judge Vaughn Walker is going down on...

...the issue of the personal gain of his own court ruling.

Lets go over the common-sense viewpoint again; A homosexual judge in a 10-year, sexual relationship with another man, and is about to retire from the bench, throws out the legal, 52% of the vote that defines marriage as being between one man and one woman. In the city of San Francisco. Okay. Wow. The prosecution rests.

Exhibit A is here. Exhibit B is here.

Gays hate it when...

...the difference between race and sexual perversion are explained.

How SB 48 tramples parental rights.

SB 48 is a Trojan horse that will violate the civil rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of glbt community. How can this be? What would the gay community do if a Christian Senator in California tried to legislate lessons concerning Christian principles to the children of gay "parents" that trampled their right to parental notification/consent? My supporting evidence is here.

Man caught in the wrong McDonalds bathroom.

An 22-year-old man goes into a female bathroom at a McDonald's and pulls out his penis near an 18-year-old and a 14-year-old girl. He disrespects them when they tell him to get out of the women's restroom. This is what happened.

Banned from YouTube because...

...it clearly shows the violent bent of homofascists against a peaceful, legal public gathering of Christians who support God's definition of marriage. Looks to me like all of the hate is coming from the homofascists to the Christians.

I had a hard time finding this video to post. More info here.

Anti-Christ Lady Gaga supports Judas.

Well, well, well. Looks like the glbt community's idol, Lady Gaga, has revealed whom she serves when it comes down to who serves Jesus Christ and who doesn't.

With less than a week until Easter, the creator of the gay national anthem, "Born This Way," has created a song that glorifies Judas. Wow. How will the glbt community react to this? Does this not reveal the spirit behind those who support the gay community? Does she not know where Judas is now? What will "Christian" gays do now? Why doesn't she diss Mohammed to be controversial?

This story is incredible.

Gender Permanence.

Great facts are given in this video. The fact that SB 48 has, "...seriously flawed thinking." How only 8 out of 100,000 people reject their own genitals. And the term,"gender permanence." I love it!

What same-sex "marriage" will bring.

Info concerning the "gay gene" here.

The hidden danger of SB 48.

As usual... race, gender, and sexual conduct are put in the same category by a homosexual. How more people don't see through this homoganda amazes me sometimes. Then, Senator Mark Leno says that glbt people are excluded from history books. Really? How does he know that? Why does he want a persons sexual behavior to be spotlighted? Shouldn't a person keep their sexual activities private?

I DO support anti-bullying for all children, but there has to be a better way than making the glorification of sexual sin mandatory learning in the classrooms of schoolchildren. Few people know that a discrimination-against-"gender-identity" clause/provision is in SB 48, which means that a boy who wants to be considered a girl cannot be prevented from using the girl's bathroom, in a California grade school, if SB 48 is made into a law. That's crazy.

Why prop 8 judge should have recused himself.

It has now come to be public knowledge that Judge Vaughn Walker stood to gain personally when he threw out the votes of 7,001,084 tax paying citizens of the great state of California. Wow.

Doesn't it stand to reason that, if a judge stands to gain from his own ruling, he should recuse himself from the case? Well, it turns out that Judge Walker is/was in a ten year sexual relationship with another man, and was less than a year away from retiring from the bench. (Look at how retirement affected his "judgement.") When he threw out the fair and legal votes of over seven million people (52% of those that voted on prop 8), he stood to gain from his decision!

My evidence is here, here, and (as of 16 April) here.

Discussion with Mr. Rusty Blustering.

Dear Rusty:

I choose not to speak to someone via two different means. I am a monotasker 89% of the time and I'm having a hard time keeping track of our private emails and your comments on my blog posts.

I'm going to ask you to list your problems/questions concerning my heteroseparatist lifestyle in the comment section of this blog post so that I can understand you better. Only you and I are going to talk here. I will be deleting any future private emails or comments to other posts from you until I'm satisfied with your answers to my questions here.

And, to be fair, I won't send you any more emails until you are satisfied with my answers to your questions. I believe that I can help you come to a more Biblical understanding of the Lord Jesus Christ.

SB 48.

Even while they cry..."Gay rights! Gay rights! Gay civil rights!" ...the glbt community doesn't even deny their desire to trample the rights of parents who won't support their sexual conduct. Thanks to this type of behavior, more and more people are starting to see through homosexual propaganda.

The talking heads of the "gay rights" movement will preach that gay people just want to be treated with respect, which is a very reasonable point-of-view, but then turn around and support laws that trample the rights of parents to protect their children.

"...The homosexual movement sees SB48 not only as a model for legislation across the country, but as a way to force homosexuality and transgenderism past parents into the minds of children. .."

My facts are here.

Are only 17 out of a 1,000 men full-time homosexuals?

“..."I see this as somewhat of a problem for the gay political movement," Sprigg said. "It undermines the idea that being born homosexual is an immutable characteristic that can't be changed.".."

"...Gates' best estimate, derived from five studies that have asked subjects about their sexual orientation, is that the nation has about 4 million adults who identify as being gay or lesbian, representing 1.7 percent of the 18-and-over population. ..” My supporting evidence is here.

Homofascism at Apple.

Dude! Where's your sock?

I can't believe how funny this "conversation" is. The hand-waving kills me!

Homosexual "marriage" and Noah's ark.

I've found a brilliant piece of writing at The Christian Post by a man calling himself "Max Veritas."

"...The "Babylonian Talmud" – the book of rabbis' interpretation of the scriptures 1,000 years before Christ, there was only one time in history that reflects where we are right now. There was only one time in history, according to these writings, where men were given in marriage to men, and women given in marriage to women.

Want to venture a guess as to when? No, it wasn't in Sodom and Gomorrah, although that was my guess. Homosexuality was rampant there, of course, but according to the Talmud, not homosexual "marriage." What about ancient Greece? Rome? No. Babylon? No again. The one time in history when homosexual "marriage" was practiced was … during the days of Noah.

And according to Jeffrey Satinover, that's what the "Babylonian Talmud" attributes as the final straw that led to the Flood. Rabbi Aryeh Spero verified this to be true. Rabbi Spero spoke of God's compassion before the Flood, in hopes people would repent and turn back to His ways. He showed patience for hundreds of years.

But, he said, the Talmud's writings reveal that "before the Flood people started to write marriage contracts between men, in other words, homosexual 'marriage,' which is more than homosexual activity – it's giving an official state stamp of approval, a sanctification … of homosexual partnership." In fact, he said, "the writings indicated that it wasn't even so much the 'straw that broke the camel's back,' but that the sin in and of itself is so contrary to why God created the world, so contrary to the order of God's nature, that God said then and there 'I have to start all over … to annihilate the world and start from the beginning. …'"

Rabbi Spero went on to say, "Even in ancient Greece they did not write marriage contracts between men. There was homosexuality, and it was wrong, but there was not an official 'blessed' policy. … Marriage is 'sanctification' (not simply a partnership)." He said to confer the title of sanctification and holiness upon this behavior is "probably one of the greatest sins of all that one does against God's plan for this world." As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man. – Mathew 24:37..."

Challenge for "hu6xxui6"

Well folks, it's happened again. Once again I'm asking a heckler from another website if he has the guts to fight me one-on-one.

It's been my experience that big-mouthed people are never going to fight me mono-e-mono. A heckler is like a jackal; useless when alone due to their pack-attack mentality and inability to think critically.

So, "hu6xxui6" do you have the guts to face me here? It'll be just you and me toe to toe. Only your comments and mine will be allowed on this post. How can you call yourself a man when you can't meet me here to debate your anti-Christ, pro same-sex marriage, point of view? Guys like you want to ignore how the people in 31 out of 31 states have voted in Constitutional amendments defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Come on. I triple-dog-dare ya!

If Christian, Muslum, or Jew, NO foster kids for you!

It's official. (This is not an April fool's joke.) British society has become a homoOrwellian reality, where gays are "more equal" than Christians. Now, in England, if you won't support the glbt lifestyle, you cannot adopt children!

<---These married Christians, Owen and Eunice Johns, have been denied the right to adopt children by London's High Court. What makes them unfit to adopt children? They are Christians, and will not support the concept that homosexuality is normal. It doesn't matter that they've fostered children before without any problems. It only matters that they won't support the glbt lifestyle.

"...Think about what this means. Britain has a huge Muslim population. Muslims, like Christians, believe that homosexual conduct is immoral. So do orthodox Jews. What the court is saying is that Christians, Muslims, and Jews are unfit to care for children simply because of their religious beliefs. ..."

"...Americans may think our First Amendment will protect us from this kind of thing happening here. Think again. In the appeal of Proposition 8, in which California citizens voted to keep marriage between one man and one woman, Judge Vaughn Walker ruled that Christian beliefs “harm gays and lesbians.”..."

My indisputable proof of British homofascism is here.

Homofascists attacking hate-free disagreement.

It took me a bit of work to embed this video since it has been removed from YouTube. It clearly shows how most gays hate non-violent, hate-free disagreement. Homofascism is sweeping the planet. Look at how the homosexual's mind locks up (@00:29) when he is asked, "Do you believe in free speech?" The gay guy can't even speak for about 4 seconds because that single question shone the light of truth on his homofascism. Can someone show me a video of Christians attacking gays who are behaving similarly? True servants of Christ don't attempt to silence gays, but most gays and those that worship homosexuality seem to always want to silence Christians and anyone who disagrees with the glbt lifestyle. Observe the false accusations of, "hater," "bigot," and the one woman using the word "fa**ot," This is raw homofascism. Raw.

MSM and SSM bring GSA? OMG! WT...

Well here it is. The new way to say "incest" is now "GSA." Genetic Sexual Attraction. Ironically, GSA also stands for Gay Straight Alliance! (If I weren't so jaded, I would throw up!) The term reminds me of how some homophiles will call their sexual relations with little boys, "male intergenerational intimacy." HomoOrwellianism at its finest!

Now, the loss of sexual sanity that was spearheaded by the glbt community has begun to devolve into its next incarnation; sexual relationships between blood relatives. I suppose I should prepare myself to be slandered by the word "siblingphobe" in the (near?) future for my refusal to support marriage between blood relatives. After all, I covered how sterile siblings could use the exact same arguments of the glbt community in my manifesto.

"...Furthermore, stigmatizing GSA is only going to cause incest advocates to adopt it as a pet cause, like the individual behind the website Full Marriage Equality, which both supports gay marriage AND incest – a conflation any gay marriage advocate would be smacking themselves in the head over. A blog post on the Full Marriage Equality site goes so far as to congratulate Lawrence and her father on their happy relationship, saying, “They are consenting adults who should be allowed to marry…. We wish them the best as a consanguinarmorous couple and family.”..."

"Consanguinarmorous" (I think that the first "r" doesn't belong) story here and here.

Listen to US!! NOT your parents!

Just when I think that I can't find any clearer evidence to illuminate how some gays want to normalize homosexuality to children, without the consent of their parents, I find this.

Why do gays demand respect for their human rights and then turn around and actively, intentionally trample the rights of Christian parents? Would the glbt community tolerate their children being taught about Christianity without their consent? I think that gays would burn down a grade school that bypassed their parental rights!

Look at what's happening in Massachusetts where homosexual "marriage" has become legal..."The goal is to reach kids before they absorb their parents' values. By middle school it's too late." -- Elementary school administrator in Massachusetts.

More info here.

Why SSM is wrong.

Also, Jesus Christ personally defined marriage.

Formerhomophobia defined.

formerhomophobia: the intense hatred, usually from gay people, for ex-gay people.

Victory for sexual sanity!!

A homosexual Federal judge in San Francisco CA, throws out California's constitutional amendment defining marriage as being between one man and one woman right before he retires. Wow.

Then comes the hypnotic drumbeat of, "...gay marriage ban.....gay marriage ban.....gay marriage ban..." Which mischaracterizes what the amendment stands for. How come no one ever says, "...ban on polygamy.....ban on polygamy.....ban on polygamy..."?

"...A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court Wednesday ruled that, despite a lower court decision overturning California’s true marriage amendment, Proposition 8, the amendment would stay in force while that decision is being appealed..."

"...“It’s a victory for Proposition 8 supporters and the initiative process as a whole. People need to have confidence that their vote will count, at least until the courts make a final decision,”..."

More detailed info here.

Apple supports formerhomophobia.

"...Clearly, Change.org and groups like it don’t care about that. They simply want to eradicate any speech that critiques their way of life, however gently and respectfully, and they will do or say almost anything to get their way - all in the name of tolerance!..."

More info here.

R.I.P. Elizabeth Taylor.

1932-2011. A true screen legend.

Formerhomophobia.

I seriously wonder if there is any group of people that are more hated by gays than ex-gays. I think that gays hate ex-gays more than they hate Christians.

Homofascists are attacking Apple just for having an iPhone app for Exodus International, a Christian ministry of formerly gay people. Talk about intolerant. The glbt community doesn't even want people to have access to information about ex-gays. Wow. Classic homofascism.

"...“At the risk of putting myself at the center of a firestorm of disapproval, I have to say that what I viewed and read on the Exodus app was not hate speech but simply the expression of religious beliefs with which I, and many other people, disagree,” wrote Pynchon...."

Story here and here.

Heteroseparatism personified.

In this viral video, the smaller boy represents a homofascist and the larger boy represents heteroseparatism.

The smaller boy is clearly the aggressor and, in his foolishness and arrogance, decides to punch the larger boy in the face twice. Only when the small, wanna-be bully advances for a third time does the larger, more powerful boy take action. Then, in a further display of his honor and righteousness, the larger boy simply walks away from the staggering little fool.

The larger boy was later punished (suspended) by the school despite the clear video evidence that he only defended himself. And the mother of the little, wanna-be bully had the nerve to demand an apology from the mother of the larger boy!

This is how heteroseparatism got started; an unjust, arrogant attack from a twisted homofascist who thought he was going to beat me up with the word "homophobe." I left him staggering, beaten, and bewildered, and some still think that I'm in the wrong despite clear and overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

Homofascism in Brazil.

Now, in Brazil, if a homosexual hears anyone speaking badly about homosexuality, he can call a special phone number and bring the weight of the Brazilian government down upon the head of the "homophobe." Right now, an "anti-gay" person can only be fined, but when will people be imprisoned for disagreeing with homosexuality?

"Although “homophobia” in Brazil is...also used to condemn those who publicly object to homosexual behavior."

"...“The Holy Mass is being celebrated. During the homily, the priest alludes to the first chapter of the letter of Saint Paul to the Romans, which strongly condemns homosexualism, both female and male (Romans 1:26-28). He cites the words of the Apostle stating that giving one’s self over the “relations against nature” (Romans 1:26) was the punishment of those who “traded the truth of God for a lie” (Romans 1:25). At that moment, someone passes in front of the church and feels uncomfortable with the preaching. He goes to a public telephone and denounces the ‘homophobic’ celebrant.”..."

"Fr. Lodi da Cruz, who is president of the organization Pro-Life Anapolis, has himself been on the receiving end of Brazilian restrictions on freedom of speech. In 2005 he was required to pay monetary damages to a pro-abortion anthropologist Debora Diniz Rodrigues for calling her an “abortionist,” because the term “gravely offends her personal honor and dignity.” The decision was upheld by two appeals courts, and the nation’s Supreme Tribunal refused to hear the case."

Story here.

How sexual sanity prevailed in Maryland.

More info here.

Loss of sexual sanity in the United Kingdom.

When any nation or people abandons the laws of sexual conduct handed down to humanity by the Word of God, children are, eventually, sexually abused.

"...called “Too Much, Too Young,” unmasks the extremely explicit nature of sex education material that public groups are pushing on school children as young as five-year-olds. Among other things, the controversial resources teach youngsters about oral and anal sex, as well as prostitution, masturbation, and “straight and gay,” and include explicit depictions and descriptions of sexual intercourse, as well as real footage of full-frontal adult nudity."

Story here.

Tsunami video.

Ex-gay video.

8.9 quake hits Japan.

It's like a disaster movie in Japan. Just before I posted this, the tsunami waves from the quake had destroyed boats in Crescent City, California! Story here.

Ex-gay man's video.

My favorite gay blogger, Joe My God, is attacking this guy. I'm supporting him.

A homosexual describes homofascism.

This is classic. Even an atheist, homosexual can see the rising tide of homofascism. Watch him describe homoOrwellianism.

Are 1 out of 20 homosexuals a child molester?

Wow. I found some scathing statistics concerning the glbt lifestyle today...

* 33% of homosexuals ADMIT to minor/adult sex (7)
* There is a notable homosexual group, consisting of thousands of members, known as the North American Man and Boy Love Association ( NAMBLA). This is a child molesting homosexual group whose cry is “SEX BEFORE 8 BEFORE IT’S TOO LATE.” This group can be seen marching in most major homosexual parades across the United States
* Homosexuals commit more than 33% of all reported child molestations in the United States, which, assuming homosexuals make up 2% of the population, means that 1 in 20 homosexuals is a child molestor, while 1 in 490 heterosexuals is a child molestor (19)
* 73% of all homosexuals have had sex with boys under 19 years of age (9)
* Many homosexuals admit that they are pedophiles: “The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality” (22)
* Because homosexuals can’t reproduce naturally, they resort to recruiting children. Homosexuals can be heard chanting “TEN PERCENT IS NOT ENOUGH, RECRUIT, RECRUIT, RECRUIT” in their homosexual parades. A group called the “Lesbian Avengers” prides itself on trying to recruit young girls. They print “WE RECRUIT” on their literature. Some other homosexuals aren’t as overt about this, but rather try to infiltrate society and get into positions where they will have access to the malleable minds of young children (e.g., the clergy, teachers, Boy Scout leaders, etc.) (8). See the DC Lesbian Avengers web page, and DC Lesbian Avengers Press Release, where they threaten to recruit little boys and girls. Also, see AFA Action Alert.


My supporting evidence is here.

Loss of sexual sanity in Canada.

In Canada where homosexual "marriage" is legal and accepted, the next rung in sexual deviance is being discussed. Now, according to an "expert," a man who desires sex with children is equal to a man who desires sex with a grown, consenting woman. The desire to have sex with a child is simply an "orientation."

"...However, MP Marc Lemay of the Bloc Quebecois challenged Van Gijseghem’s definition. “I have to admit that I was not expecting, on this Valentine’s Day, to be talking about this inappropriate type of love. It is not really love. It has more to do with violence and control. I am concerned, Professor Van Gijseghem … because you say, if I am not mistaken, that pedophilia is a sexual orientation.”

“That is what I said,” continued Van Gijseghem.

Lemay pursued the point, asking if it therefore should “be compared to homosexuality.”..."

Perverted, wicked story here.

Gay curriculum ignores parental consent.

Sometimes, when I'm in a debate with a homofascist, I'll ask the question,"Would you tolerate someone teaching Christianity to your child without your consent?" I never get the obvious answer to that simple question because it will immediately collapse the argument for teaching children that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents; one of the prime goals of the majority of the glbt community. Note the excerpts below...

"...their rights were being violated because they had no control over whether their children received such lessons.
“No one should take my right to tell me what can be shown to my child,” Cookie Gordon, a mother of two, told the board."

"...“These controversial issues don’t belong in the classroom, no matter how many times people vote on marriage,” said Karen England, a member of the State Central Committee of the California Republican Party. “The homosexual activists have repeatedly been pushing for more and more in sexual curriculum when our kids can’t read or write.”..."

"State law does not allow parents to remove their children from particular lessons that are part of a set curriculum."

"...a mother angrily waved a crossword puzzle assigned her 9-year old daughter that included the word “lesbian.” (The clue: “Two women who love each other in a romantic way.”)..."

"...Vallejo’s Christians felt that their voice was being suppressed.
“When you call us haters, or bigoted, or unintelligent because we believe in God’s word,” Mr. Jefferson said, “that’s hate, that’s bigotry.”..."

Story here.

Homofascists attacking Christian bed-and-breakfast in America.

Most (if not all) gays will say that same-sex "marriage" will do no harm. BULL***T!

Anyone who does not support homosexuality will be attacked.

Same-sex "marriage" will provoke God and end the religious freedom that the United States of America was founded for.

"Todd Wathen and his [homosexual] partner hired attorney Betty Tsamis, who claims that “it is unlawful for a business open to the public to deny goods and/or services to someone on the basis of sexual orientation.” Since neither owner rents his facility out for either homosexual or heterosexual civil union ceremonies, one wonders how they can be accused of discriminating against homosexuals."

"One of the bed and breakfasts, Timber Creek in Paxton, Illinois, is owned by Jim Walder, a Christian father of five children who has been deluged with vicious, hateful emails and phone calls. This comes as no surprise to those of us who spend much of our time exposing and opposing the homosexuality-normalizing juggernaut, but it’s been an emotionally devastating experience for the Walders who did not ask for this battle. [Editor's note: since Higgins' article was published and the case got national attention, Walder has not received hundeds of encouraging notes -- far outnumbering the homosexual hate mail..."

Story here.

Amy Day's thoughts on homosexual "marriage."

I rediscovered this article by Amy Day and decided to post it. (I found it in one paragraph, and spaced it into four.)

Amy Day

Our government doesn't recognize and regulate marital relationships based on the feelings of those involved, but because it recognizes the unique benefits to society inherent only to traditional marriage. No other relationship joins together and equally represents both genders in our dual-gendered society, nor can government provide or replicate the stability such voluntary relationships engender, nor can any other relationship properly provide for the needs of offspring which may result from dual-gendered coupling.

Marriages are not private relationships, such as friendships, but are public relationships with societal implications: hence government supports that which it did not create, but that which is inherently beneficial to us all. No other relationship in society, including same-sex or business relationships, can contribute to society that which traditional marriages can. Nor can/aught a few “we-the-people’s” arbitrarily, through judicial activism, neuter or redefine marriage for the rest of society, and leave all of society with the consequences of such an ill-conceived science experiment, using humans as guinea pigs.

Those who promote ssm have yet to provide compelling arguments for general societal acceptance of such radical changes to marriage, nor can they show, through time-tested means, benefits to society in general.

Name-calling is no substitute for reason.

Denouncing Westboro Baptist "Church." (Again)

This man, Mr. Fred Phelps, is NOT a Christian. As the founder of heteroseparatism, I completely wash my hands of the Westborough Baptist Church.

Any person who calls themselves a Christian and does not live by the commandments of Christ is a liar.

The Bible, the Word of God, is not to be used without love. Kindness is an aspect of love. Although it is true that a person who embraces sexual sin, (homosexuality being a very big sexual sin) cannot enter into God's kingdom when they die, picketing the funeral of a homosexual and, thereby, provoking their parents/loved ones, is not an act of kindness.

This post was inspired by this news story.

Homophile gets 248 years.

This homophile used his power and authority to rape young boys.

"It's beyond the comprehension of most human beings," the judge said. "It's not unlike slavery of old, to go through the (foster) system and obtain a human being and attempt to mold that individual to satisfy one's own sexual desires. Disgusting. This one has got to be the worst. It's the worst of the worst."

"Prosecutors said another 11 men came forward to claim Foulk molested them as children dating back to 1965, but only the son's case could be prosecuted because of the statute of limitations."

"Prosecutor Danette Gomez argued that Foulk used the foster care system to acquire boys to meet his insatiable sexual appetite, knowing they had no parents to turn to."

Full story here.

Is Someone Born a Homosexual?

Informative DOMA video.

Montana defending sexual sanity.

The State of Montana is fighting for the rights of parents when it comes to what their kids are being taught about sexual matters in public schools.

"A document outlining the program released in June said that “body part language” would be introduced in kindergarten, the idea of same-sex love in grade one, and methods of sexual intercourse would be taught to fifth-graders."

"The lawsuit filed on Friday claims that the school district violated right-to-known policies. It argues that documentation of curriculum developments, including correspondence and meeting minutes, were withheld from concerned parties, and that the public was excluded from curriculum committee meetings. It requests that the budget and all information relating to the curriculum be made public."

Full article here.

DOMA in a coma.

According to Article 2, section 3, clause 4 of the Constitution, the President must support DOMA.

Now, the phrase, "Anti-gay," can get the President of the United States to ignore the law. Is this the official start of the end of sexual sanity in the United States? Homosexuality is not an immutable circumstance like race or gender; I cover that fact in this blog.

DOMA was created to prevent one state's homofascism from affecting another state.

"The bans on incestuous and polygamous marriages are ancient and deeprooted, and, as the majority suggests, they are supported by strong considerations of social policy," Baxter warned. "Our society abhors such relationships, and the notion that our laws could not forever prohibit them seems preposterous. Yet here, the majority overturns, in abrupt fashion, an initiative statute confirming the equally deeprooted assumption that marriage is a union of partners of the opposite sex. The majority does so by relying on its own assessment of contemporary community values, and by inserting in our Constitution an expanded definition of the right to marry that contravenes express statutory law.

"Who can say that, in 10, 15 or 20 years, an activist court might not rely on the majority's analysis to conclude, on the basis of a perceived evolution in community values, that the laws prohibiting polygamous and incestuous marriages were no longer constitutionally justified?" Baxter wrote.

That argument, in fact, is being made now in a court case in Canada, where the acknowledgement of "marriage rights" for same-sex duos is being cited as a reason to strike polygamy laws.

Those arguing officially on behalf of marriage are from ProtectMarriage.com, which was the group behind Proposition 8 when voters adopted it in 2008.

The ADF said the case has the potential to create "years of chaos and confusion in the legal battle to preserve marriage. It could impact marriage laws in up to 45 other states – including the … states where voters overwhelmingly adopted state constitutional amendments…"

The ADF report said also at stake in the issue is:

The common sense idea that every child should have a right to be raised in a home with both a mom and a dad

Whether America will be forced to accept the bizarre, court-invented claim that men and women are interchangeable

Whether Americans will be forced to surrender their freedom to set public policy to a small group of wealthy activists who wish to impose their will on a state or an entire nation

Whether marriage will remain a unique institution that promotes the important interests of children and society…

Whether voters may freely consider their own moral and religious views about marriage … or be forced by violence and intimidation to remain silent

Whether voters may collectively decide through the democratic process that marriage between one man and woman should be protected..."



I'm surprised that Fox news allowed the phrase, "anti-gay" in their headline. Story here.

From lesbian to Christian.

Gay man rescued.

Senator Scott Brown isn't gay because...

...he knew that the homosexual advances of an older boy were abusive.

Many gay men label their childhood seduction into the glbt community, by an older homosexual, as an act of "love" and embrace the gay lifestyle. I call them Stockholm homosexuals and cover this phenomenon in my Internet manifesto. But, because of an abusive stepfather, Senator Brown knew that his youth camp counselor was wrong in his homosexual advances. Speaking about his homosexual molester, Brown said. "He said 'If you tell anybody, you know, I'll kill you. I will make sure that no one believes you.'"

Silencing certain people is a key goal of the gay community, and being falsely labeled as a "homophobe," led me to create the word "heteroseparatist."

Senator Scott Brown's story is here and here.

"Born gay" used to be an insult to homosexuals.

Apparently, 20 to 25 years ago, a homosexual would be insulted by the "born gay" concept. I never knew this. Go to 1:08 on the video to hear an ex-gay man tell you himself.

homoOrwellian

homoOrwellian:

The belief that non-heterosexuals are "more equal" than heterosexuals.


San Francisco is a homoOrwellian city.

You can't say "prom King" you heterosexist pig!!

YOU HETEROSEXIST PIG!!!

I should have seen this one coming.

Now, thanks to the glbt community, the terms, "prom King," and "prom Queen," are probably soon to be labeled as "hate speech" by the division of humanity that rejects their own genitals.

A high school in Michigan is having a "gender-neutral" prom due to one "transgendered" (OMG!) student. The parents of the kids in this school that still hold on to sexual sanity are considering holding a private, heteroseparatist prom where nobody will be persecuted for saying, "prom King/Queen." Story here.

Homosexual "marriage"? How cute!

Look at how sweet and innocent the cover of this vile book is. It's like the marketing design of a box of candy.

Look at the light blue background and the innocent, cute little birds. Look at how the strings that hold up the sign rise up and out of view as if God himself is holding them. Look at the smiling, clean shaven faces of the homosexuals holding hands. Observe the free-floating balloons that defy the laws of physics just to be near the two well-dressed sodomites. See how the little boy is dressed the same way as the men, yet his jacket is a lighter color. Will he be awarded a black jacket when he graduates to anal intercourse like the gay men have? And why is the guy in the glasses looking at the little boy's butt instead of looking at the guy he's "marrying"?

Why is the little boy pointing up like that and smiling even broader than the 44-times-more-likely-to-contract-AIDS men? Is he pointing up as if to say, "Hey there fellow child! I've got something fun to tell you about!"?

My God this is sad.