Aservant's article. Part 3 of 5.

I did not speak to John after this incident for several months, and honestly, I did not intend to speak with him again. I felt I had been betrayed and lied to. But as time passed, (and this is where my personal spiritual state relates to the story), loneliness set in and I was very much still in my “questioning” phase of life, so I finally went to see how he was doing.

I have come to realize that one can easily fall prey to negative situations if they aren't deeply committed to a standard, or a truth, or a morality, if you will. And this is so important to understand with this issue, for this is the vast majority of people today in society. Most are like me; raised from broken homes without a solid moral foundation, lonely, and desperately searching for a connection. And I am not speaking of sex here, but rather a sense of “community”. What society offers us may feel good for a time and the pain goes away.........but it never lasts, and then we are left alone again, searching, longing....... False idols are offered to fill the void.


John was very remorseful and apologized profusely about the whole prior situation. I didn't ask exactly what had happened and he didn't volunteer the information. He seemed genuinely embarrassed and as though he had learned a lesson. He had gone back to the hotel where we had met and was working a menial position. I felt bad for him and believed he had just made a big mistake in judgment, getting caught up in having too much of a “good time”.


So we began to converse again and I worked on a restaurant plan for this new private interest. John seemed to be genuinely different. He seemed to have taken on a much more humble persona and we conversed about matters of substance. This finally lead to me asking about his sexual orientation. He told me he was bi-sexual, but had always been in the closet. He said that only his family knew and he was terribly judged and criticized for this and it had caused him great pain. He revealed that part of the reason for him relocating to the area was to escape that situation. And he did seem to be a man in great pain....this did not look like an easy thing for him to confess as I sat there in front of him. Once again, I felt bad for him......and frankly, I admired his candor and honesty. It seemed he was turning over a new leaf.


So life continued...I worked on the opening of the new restaurant for almost a year, and upon opening, I decided to bring John into the fold again as a dining room manager at the new restaurant. The owners knew him from the previous restaurant and liked him, although they were oblivious to the scandal that had culminated in his resignation. He seemed to be a repented individual, and while I planned the restaurant, we talked much and really got to know each other. I grew to genuinely like John a lot and began to consider him a good friend, eventually the best friend I had at the time.


As our friendship grew, John confided in me more and more, and part of this was him being more open about his homosexuality. He eventually told me that he had never been directly asked about his sexual orientation like I had asked him, and at the time, he didn't have the courage to tell me the whole truth. He now told me that he wasn't bi-sexual, he was strictly gay. I didn't really feel I had been lied to at the time and didn't read too much into it. It did seem to be very hard for him when he had first told me, and this is a sensitive subject. I gave John the complete benefit of my doubt.


Once again, I will mention here that all becomes much clearer with hindsight. Now that I look back, this was the time of the “ramping up” of the gay agenda. This is around the time of the Matthew Shepard case, the raging popularity of shows like “Will and Grace” and the constant media attention about the “don't ask, don't tell” policy, just to name a few of the gay issues in the spot light at that time. I know without a doubt that this ubiquitous gay propaganda had a strong impact on my dealings with and perception of John, but I was completely unaware of it at the time. I say this because now as I look back, I was lied to repeatedly and grossly manipulated, and as you will read, these lies and manipulation became vicious and destructive. Under normal circumstances, I would have already ended this friendship after the initial “wine” episode, but I remember feeling so badly for this rejected, suffering individual, just like I did when I heard about the Matthew Shepard case and other propaganda like it. I now know that I was played, like we are all being played.


Another aspect that now came into play is that I was to meet several of John's gay acquaintances. If they were more than that, that is, if they were also lovers, I don't know. John never spoke to me about his sexual exploits and I never inquired. They were only introduced as friends. Sometimes in the evenings John and I would talk at his apartment or mine, and now and then one of this friends would drop by for a bit and we would talk. Well, it was more them talking about their “drama” and John and I listening. I began to hear some very outrageous things and I began to see a pattern. The pattern was one of people with lives out of control. One friend in particular would brag about his ability to steal.....and not just steal anything, but walk into a major department store and walk out the front door with furniture on a regular basis! He had an apartment completely decorated with all of the stolen merchandise and he enjoyed gloating over this fact. Other friends would give consistent accounts about their escapades with “straight guys” that either had girlfriends or were married and talk about how they were going to “turn them”. All of them seemed to be committed to gossip, drank in excess and/or used other substances, and were especially vindictive if someone crossed them. For example, the same friend that was the master thief was dismissed from a job once for suspicion of stealing while I knew him, but before he left he bragged to us as to how he had severely sabotaged company property. And they were all very materialistic.


So of course, the reader is probably asking themselves at this point..... “If this was the company this man kept, and after our prior experience, why did I continue the friendship?” Well, I did not see John to be a party to any kind of this behavior, and we spent a lot of time together and actually lived in the same apartment complex now. These were acquaintances dropping by, and, to my knowledge, not all that frequently, and I accepted the narrative of the time.

The narrative was, and still is, that these were poor suffering souls that only acted this way because the world made them act this way. If we were only to show them some understanding, they would be OK. And look at what had just happened between myself and John.....this is exactly what I had done with him, and as a result he confided in me, and now I felt I was watching him become a new person. And remember my own spiritual condition as well as I have mentioned, which really blinded me to what was really important in my life. Superficially I appeared “fine”, but in reality I was drifting and alone, having abandoned much of my commitment to the discipline of my youth in the name of “fitting in”.


So I began to see a pattern already amongst this gay crowd that I was acquainted with, but as I just said, I didn't link their homosexuality to their other destructive behavior. What I linked the destructive behavior to was the effects of discrimination, and my perceived transformation of John gave testament to this....or so I thought. The propaganda was deep within me.




I mentioned in the beginning of this article that a major change for me between then and now is that I have become a Christian. Christianity has much to say about the company one keeps and how that reflects on and affects one's character. Although I thought John was different now, it wasn't to be.....I finally realized that he was just using me for the opportunity to run his next racket. But I didn't come to this conclusion just yet, for I was becoming somewhat self destructive myself and couldn't see the forest for the trees.


I will cut out many details for the sake of brevity, but we were to work on two more projects over the next two years. I had set, as a condition of our relationship, a zero tolerance policy for improprieties on John’s behalf, and I had clearly vocalized this to him. I had a solemn promise from him that those days were over. Even still, in the first project, there came to light management indiscretions on John's behalf once again, and although it wasn't outright theft, I was furious, based upon the agreement we had, but I let it blow over. Shortly after I left that project for personal reasons, but my friendship with John continued. As such, I began to notice a lot of contradictions in things he told me, especially about his past. Things that had nothing to do with the gay issue, but eluded more to an almost criminal inclination that he was, maybe, trying to hide.....or maybe trying to overcome or out run....I didn't know for sure. But the short lived confidence I had placed in John's “new found character” began to erode.


A short time later, another project came up that would involve John again. Yes, I know the reader is asking, “What in the name of God was I thinking?”, but I did believe this one to be different. I knew the owner of the business personally and he was the one that had brought John into the fold, not I. This owner had great respect for me and my ability, so it was really for him that I took on this endeavor, it just so happened that I would be working with John again. I shared my reservations about John with the owner, but he assured me that all would be fine. He was dead wrong.


It was only a matter of months before I caught John completely red handed embezzling the business. This was the final straw. I confronted him and presented the owner with the evidence. I then came under the impression that the owner had been manipulated as well, for although he could not deny the preponderance of evidence, he was trying to find a way to salvage the working relationship. This was amazing to me, because there was no doubt now as to how deceitful John had been with this proprietor. At the same time, I also confronted John about many of the contradictions he had told me about over the time of our friendship. I went as far as telling him that I was now pretty well convinced that he was a complete fraud and probably even a career criminal, and I needed some hard, straight answers not to come to this conclusion. He could say nothing of value whatsoever in his defense. The only thing he tried to offer up was how terrible it was to be a hated homosexual and that it basically drove him to do these things! In that moment, it all came crashing in. This had all been a fraud from the start. It was a masterful playing of the “victim card” to get people off guard so they could be taken advantage of.


Well, the proprietor of the business arranged a meeting between all parties and gave John the chance to explain himself. There were two reasons that I tolerated this. First, I had put myself in the very poor situation of not having a lot of other immediate, quality employment options at the time, and I had put a lot of work into this project that I hoped I could salvage. Second, I thought John's ass was going to be nailed to the wall, and frankly, I was going to enjoy it.


What I heard from John astounded me. He dropped the “Homosexual Card” again....and then went on to say that he was deathly afraid of me, so much so that he had filed a police report saying that I had threatened his life! I refused to compromise under any circumstance. This time, I informed the business owner, John's boss and mine, in detail of all of the past indiscretions on the part of John and that we had been through this song-and-dance several times already. I also told him that if John was not removed from the business immediately, I would resign and call the police myself. That's all it took. John was gone and our relationship was over.


Now, I'm sure that there are readers who will say..... “So you write an article about the dangers of the homosexual lifestyle based upon one corrupt individual? That is ignorant and not reflective of the homosexual community as a whole, no more than criminal activity by non-gays reflects on their behavior as a whole”, and that is true. But this was just the beginning........


Now that John was expelled from the business and our friendship permanently over, I began to hear many disturbing things. This was a small community and there were many that knew both John and me. Several came forward to tell me that they had been told by him that we were a couple! They had even been told that I had married in order to disguise my closet homosexuality, for during the years that I knew John, I had indeed married. They were also informed that I had had several gay rendezvous with friends of John's. It also seemed to be widely thought that I was of the same character as John and we were sort of a “team” that ran rackets on business owners. I thought to myself, “So this is what tolerance and forgiveness gets you.” I came to realize that without knowing it, my association with John was quickly ruining my personal and professional reputation, and, in fact, had already largely ruined it in that community. I now became convinced, and still am, that John may have had tendencies actually quite sinister and a long list of victims. In hindsight, I believe this actually could have developed into a dangerous situation, and in fact already was, by the time it was resolved.


During my final months of working with John, I had learned much more about his past as I have stated already. I had learned that he had done time in jail. I had also learned of other very shady associates of his during that time, and from the time before I had met him. I began to question if everything I had ever been told had been a lie. This is what prompted me to begin the investigation that resulted in the discovery of the embezzlement of the business. I ended up wondering, and still do to this day, if this man was a sort of a sociopath that was able to lie without remorse. I couldn't help but think of how he had told me about being persecuted by his own family for being gay. Now I was thinking that this probably wasn't the case at all. His strained family relationship probably had much more to do with his manipulation, lying and outright criminality.


Once again, I am omitting many, many details here for the sake of brevity, but this experience shook me to the core. But even still, I didn't associate almost all of John’s poor character traits to his sexual orientation in any way. That wouldn't come until a few years later.


Central to this story is my own spiritual turmoil at this time of my life. The chapter with John had definitely taught me some hard lessons, but I still was too blind to see my underlying character issues that attracted me to that situation in the first place. This resulted in a couple more years of “wandering”, so to speak, that landed me eventually in Ft. Lauderdale, only because I had a friend there that could offer me a place to stay and a job. Now, I will say I wasn't so oblivious that I got myself into another situation as poor as the one that I had developed with John, but everything didn't go from bad to great overnight, converting me into the man that writes this today. This was a step by step process over time.


But although I was still “getting it together” during this time, I had very profound spiritual experience that lead me to study the bible. This experience had nothing to do with John or the gay issue, it is another story. But I mention here because it was the key to finally and truly opening my eyes about our society in general for good. And of course, part of the truth about our society includes the homosexual issue.


All I had known of Ft. Lauderdale until this point in my life, was that it was the spring break capital of the US, so imagine my surprise upon arrival of being immersed in a gay community 70,000 strong. I knew absolutely nothing of this before my arrival. Being that I did not have a lot of money and the area is very expensive, I found an affordable place close to my place of work that had been arranged for me by the friend I previously mentioned. My residence was in the black community that borders the gay community of Wilton Manors. Every day I had to commute through the gay area to arrive at work and I rode a mountain bike. My workplace, a beach front hotel, had a large percentage of homosexuals as employees, including the general manager and human resources manager, among others.

The importance of words.

The misuse of words is what got me started here at heteroseparatist.com.

Often, when the correct definition of "marriage" is legislated, it is very often mischaracterized as a, "ban on same-sex 'marriage.' " That mischaracterization happins in this very video at 2:19.

Minneapolis News and Weather KMSP FOX 9

More info here.

Anti Christian Liberties Union.

Let me see if I can get this straight; the ACLU is fighting to bypass parental consent?!? Doesn’t the “CL” in ACLU stand for “civil liberties”? Is it not a civil liberty to protect one’s children? Doesn’t the ACLU recognize the concept of parental consent when it comes to a parent’s moral objection to their child being exposed to sexual subject matters? Does ACLU stand for Anti Christian Liberties Union?

“…When a kindergarten boy brought home a children’s book touting the joys of being in a lesbian family, his parents complained to Windridge Elementary School, sparking a petition signed by 25 parents in protest.
The book, “In Our Mother’s House,” is marketed on Amazon as a book for children “ages 6 and up.”

…It touches on the alleged joys of being in a homosexual relationship and what the author believes is society’s condemnation of it.

…Now the American Civil Liberties Union is getting involved – threatening the district for requiring parental consent. (<---say what!!)

…In the book, a resident in a Berkley, Calif., neighborhood is depicted as a constantly scowling woman who wears a pink bow in her hair. She disapproves of the neighboring family’s lesbian relationship and won’t let her children play with them.
She tells the lesbian couple, “I don’t appreciate what you two are!”
The lesbians, Meema and Marmee, comfort their children.
“She’s full of fear, sweetie,” Meema tells them. “She’s afraid of what she can’t understand: She doesn’t understand us.”

…Polacco noted, “What I did take exception to was this mother – who had the right to have this book kept from her child – decided to take it upon herself within that school, and then the entire district, to see that YOUR child couldn’t read the book, either. That’s where I think our First Amendment rights are getting trounced.”
However, as previously noted, the book has not been removed from the school libraries. Children are simply required to obtain parental consent before checking it out.

…“Parents have the ‘fundamental right’ to ‘direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.’ The district is right to leave such decisions to them,”… “Public schools should not surrender to ACLU intimidation when it asks them to expose children to sexual content without parental knowledge. …”

Full story/article here.

Cool poster.

Points 11 and 14 caught my attention.

So a child doesn't need a mother and a father?!?

Isn’t it obvious that a child needs a mother and a father? I quietly separate myself from people that think otherwise.

"…that led the American Psychological Association (in 2005) to assert that the children of gay and lesbian parents are in no way disadvantaged, compared to the children of heterosexual parents, has concluded those studies were inadequate. According to Dr. Loren Marks, Associate Professor at Louisiana State University, who authored the analysis: “The available data, which are drawn from small convenience samples, are insufficient to support a strong generalizable claim...

…Those who knew that their mothers had had a lesbian relationship fared significantly worse on measures of educational attainment and household income, reported more depression, used marijuana more, more often reported forced sexual encounters…

…Those who knew their fathers had had a gay relationship were more likely to have been arrested, to have thought recently about suicide, to feel depressed, to report sexually transmitted diseases and to have experienced forced sex. …

…Twenty-three percent of young adults who knew their mother to have had a gay relationship reported being forced to have sexual contact with a parent or adult caregiver, while only 2 percent of intact families with a mother and father reported such contact. For female young adults, that figure leapt to 31 percent (while only 3 percent of young women from intact heterosexual families reported this). …

…What we should avoid at all costs is silencing such research and such discussion because it is seen by some as politically incorrect. Where optimizing the well-being of children is involved, no stone should be left unturned. …”

Story here and here.

HRC linked to child rape.

I’m well aware that all homosexuals aren’t a danger to children, but I’m also aware that, when a man breaks from sexual sanity, he becomes a danger to children. A man who is sexually attracted to boys doesn’t see sex with boys as something wrong, he sees the act of sex with a child as an act of “love,” because that’s what he was told when he was seduced, by an older male, into homosexuality himself.

This is one of the reasons the glbt community is so desperate to bypass parental consent to normalize homosexuality to children.

I'm surprised that the San Francisco Chronicle even reported this story. More info here.

Aservant's article. Part 2 of 5.

This story spans over 15 years and has many, many details, some of which may seem irrelevant to the issue in question. That being said, I would like to encourage the reader to read on, to eventually be able to understand the need to include so much detail in this story.

I arrived into young adulthood as a default liberal. What I mean by that is that I was never indoctrinated directly during my upbringing to embrace liberal viewpoints, I simply absorbed them by default through the culture at large. I have come to believe that unless one is raised as overtly conservative and often Christian as well, one will ultimately take on the progressive/liberal world view. This was me to a fault.


I have worked in the culinary industry my whole career which has always had its fair share of gays, especially as service staff. Being that I was a young liberal, this was a non- issue. Also, keep in mind that when I started my career just over 25 years ago, the world was a different place. Sure, the gay revolution was well under way, but it wasn't on steroids as it is today. There was no “Queer Eye for The Straight Guy” or “Will and Grace” or aggressive pro-gay campaigns in the name of “tolerance” in public education. As such, although I knew and worked with many openly homosexual men, their attitude towards me, and their attitude in general was very different than what I observe today. They knew I was straight, I knew they were gay, and boundaries were respected. Sometimes there was a bit of good natured teasing that went both ways, but I never personally witnessed any discrimination or bigotry towards the many homosexuals I knew. That isn't to say that homosexuals haven't suffered discrimination or been affected by bigotry, but it wasn't my experience. Everyone got along fine and for all intents and purposes, although I was never close to being anything like a gay activist, in my personal views I was pro-gay. I would define this by saying that I didn't see any homosexuals that I knew as being really any different than myself, with the only exception being their sexual orientation. If anyone expressed a contrary viewpoint, I didn't “fight for gay rights”, but I did get in a few discussions defending what I thought was my “enlightened” point of view, and at the very least, I was uncomfortable hearing viewpoints that portrayed homosexuals as anything “deviant”. But I will say that the thought of actual homosexual acts between men has always been repugnant to me no matter what the social/political viewpoint I expressed at whatever time. This has been so ever since I was old enough to understand the concept of homosexuality. I now strongly believe that my repugnance came and comes from a much deeper truth than the one I became to believe in as a young adult liberal, but I denied it. I learned to deny it by being exposed to relentless propaganda that made me feel that there was something repugnant about my repugnance.......


I did not understand at the time which I described in the above paragraph that my pro-gay beliefs were due to being heavily propagandized by the media to see gays as oppressed victims. This of course would explain the “why” as to my being “pro-gay” in my social/political viewpoint, but at the same time still unable to accept the actual thought of gay sex itself. It is only been within approximately the last 5 years that I have been able to finally put those pieces together with hindsight. As I said before, the world was different 25 years ago, and although the political gay movement wasn't nearly as advanced as it is today, it was well underway. The time I am speaking of was the late 80s and early 90s. This was the time of the AIDS epidemic and the Oscar award-winning movie “Philadelphia”, a brilliant propaganda piece that succeeded in harnessing a massive amount of goodwill towards the gay community from the public at large. I obviously didn't realize it at the time, but due to works like “Philadelphia” and many others to come, done in such a masterful, almost subliminal manner to invoke empathy for homosexuals, I and large segments of mainstream society had or were becoming “pro-gay”. Unaware that we were being indoctrinated into this viewpoint, it seemed as though this was just another “social enlightenment”, such as equal recognition of women under the law or guaranteed civil rights for non-white minorities. I think that I felt, along with many others, that we were just naturally “evolving” into a morally superior people by accepting this benevolent, “diverse” way of life. This was progression, pure and simple.......


But being that I now write this essay for “heteroseperatist.com”, it goes without saying that I now know this was and continues to be a complete farce. I will tell you about here in detail how this fraud was revealed to me through subsequent years of direct exposure to the gay lifestyle, a lifestyle that 25 years ago I thought I knew......but it has now become obvious that my superficial dealings with homosexuals at that time did not educate me in the least about the hard facts of this proclivity. Although the gays I knew at that time were living as open homosexuals, it is once again now blatantly obvious to me that they were very guarded still amongst non-gays about revealing the totality of what “gay culture” was and is. I was very naïve as well, too quick to believe in the general good intentions of human beings. In the years since, my same exposure to this culture has seen homosexuals become very emboldened and confident in the political and social gains that their movement has achieved. This has resulted in many gays abandoning their guarded behavior when around non-gays and allowing us to really see the gay lifestyle as it truly is. What I have seen, and what I will tell you about here, is gay culture in reality without the media filter, .... and it isn't pretty. Looking back on a few occasions, I saw signs of this with the homosexuals that I knew, but I ignored and even buried some of the uncomfortable feelings I had from time to time as I believed the problem was with me....I was “intolerant.”


So on the gay question, all was fine more or less for me as a young adult. To sum it up, I was never a radical gay rights activist or anything as such, but I did believe the propaganda that there was really no difference between gay and straight, it was just a matter of preference, and I felt I had the direct experience with many gay friends to back this opinion with truth.


Things began to change for me in the late nineties because of a close friendship I developed with a homosexual. Now, at the time, I wasn't the man that writes this today in many significant ways, most importantly, I was not a Christian, and I would even go as far as saying that I was somewhat anti-Christian, although I did not call myself that. I saw Christian doctrine through the lens of the typical, modern progressive liberal, although I had never read the Bible. Of course this made me extremely ignorant about my own supposed convictions, but you wouldn't convince me of that at the time. I was quite indoctrinated, and like almost all progressives of our age, my opinion was that Christianity had some good ideas, yes, but the majority of the philosophy was basically a manipulation to keep humans in line through oppression. So at the time in my life where my story begins, I want the reader to know that I wasn't and never had been a criminal or a delinquent, but from where I stand now looking back, I was in some very deep spiritual trouble at the time, although completely oblivious to that fact. But
for most judging me by appearance, I was a pretty capable, hardworking, intelligent young man with a lot going for him.


Let me give you an even better idea of the person that I was at this time. I think this is important because I now know as well that broken people will believe in broken ideologies. It is now clear to me that the promotion of homosexuality as a “normal” lifestyle is a broken ideology, so of course, as I have already made clear, I took it in, for I was spiritually “broken”. I came from a home of divorced parents with an abusive childhood, which left me without a solid foundation for forming healthy relationships. This left me restless and longing for meaningful connection with others. Although I always had a strong work ethic and was considered a high performer, I was in bad spiritual straights at this time in my life as I have already mentioned. Through other circumstances in my life not to do with this issue; family, romantic and professional issues, I had begun to question much about society in general and what my role in the world was, and mostly in a very negative way. Once again, all this has become clear to me in hindsight, and I was completely oblivious to it at the time, but the few solid values that I did have, the ones that had carried me through until that point in my life were trashed.....and they were trashed by me. Values like solid commitment to my work and scrutinizing the character of those I associated with. It will become clearer as to what this means and how it relates to this tale as my story progresses.


I had relocated to the American South West by this time in my life, and I was on a sort of “adventure” ….so to speak, to find myself. I was disenchanted with my profession, but still trying to have faith, but I more or less worked as a way to pay the bills. I found a job running a small hotel kitchen, and this is where the my friendship with the gay individual began, for he had just gotten a job at the same property. I will call him John.


John had just recently located to the area as well, and upon meeting him, I had no idea that he was gay. He was not effeminate and very much an extrovert. In a word, he was very entertaining. Furthermore, I had come from a large city and was now in a rural area with a different culture and I felt somewhat out of place. I knew no one in the area and it was rather lonely. John had also come from a large city where he had worked as a fine dining waiter and dining room manager, and he too felt somewhat out of place. So began our friendship.....


Within a few months, John had landed a job at a small fine dining room in the area, one of a handful, as the dining room manager, and they were badly in need of a qualified chef. I got the job immediately.


In my business, after hours socialization among the staff is very common, and as you can imagine, this usually involves alcohol and sometimes other substances. My situation was no different here. We often went out as a group and had a lot of fun, with some having more “fun” than others, to the point of overdoing it. I was rarely one of those individuals, mostly because my position demanded too many hours, although there were a few hangovers, but on a personal level, I knew I was escaping my accepted norms of personal discipline bit by bit.


It was through these social interactions that I and others at our work place began to suspect that John was maybe gay, but it wasn't really an issue, more of a curiosity. Meanwhile, improprieties began to surface in the dining room where we worked. For example, John would often take bottles of wine for personal consumption and sometimes share them with me and others. It started with the odd bottle, but soon progressed to a couple or more bottles virtually every night. Now, remember that in my position I was half of the management with John for an owner of the business, and although I had a few more late nights than I should have at times, I was always honest to a “T” and ethical about my position. So finally one night I inquired with John as to if the wine was always paid for as it began to seem excessive. He of course assured me it was, and being that the owner of the business was involved in the operation day to day, I couldn't imagine that he was getting away with consistent thievery, so I took him at his word.


But soon other issues about John's character began to appear and they began to bother me. For example, he would often ask me to lend him money until payday......usually no more than $50 dollars. But when payday came, I would have to ask for my money, it wasn't volunteered to be paid, and it was almost always short. This happened several times, until I finally became frustrated and asked as to why he couldn't simply pay what he had borrowed. John was very taken aback, and replied...... “Why didn't you tell me I owed you more?” To this I replied.... “Your debts are your responsibility, not mine, and I am not your parent. Why don't you keep track of your debts in an honest manner?” Judging by the expression on his face, this seemed to be an alien concept to him, but he did pay me.


Finally, after only about 5 months of working together, a huge scandal ensued. A couple of waiters that worked with us came to my place of residence in a panic and told me that the owner was calling the police. They said that he had discovered that he was missing several cases of high dollar wine and suspected he had been being robbed for quite some time. John was the prime suspect of course, but as these waiters rambled on about the situation in a rather frazzled manner, other names were being dropped and fingers were pointing in every direction. Finally, John himself showed up at my place, naming names himself and attempting to admit to maybe some small improprieties, but in large he was trying to absolve himself of all responsibility in the matter. I told them all that I wanted nothing to do with this and they all needed to leave. I felt my initial suspicions about John had been correct.


It turned out that no charges were filed, some wine was returned, John and a waiter resigned and no one in particular was blamed. To this day I don't really know exactly what happened, for it was inconsequential to me. At the same time this “scandal” ensued, I had met a regular diner that very much liked my food and wanted me to do a restaurant for him, so I conveniently resigned myself and went to go work on this project.

The difference between "black" and "gay."

Consider the words “Polish” and “polish.” The former defines a nationality, while the latter defines the action of shining shoes. Yet, the only difference in the two words is the capitalization of it's first letter. What a world of difference based upon whether or not the first letter is capitalized!

When I use the phrase “black people,” or “gay people,” the words “black” and “gay” are describing two different social groups. But when I say “black person,” or “gay person,” the word “gay” totally changes in its meaning and is now revealing an aspect of the person’s character, whereas the meaning of the word “black” does not change; the word "black" does not reveal an aspect of a person's character.

This subtle difference is always overlooked when the words “black” and “gay” are used a in debate concerning civil rights, yet this difference is well known to black people. It seems that many are ignorant of this subtle, yet significant, difference.

Story here.

School bus monitor bullied.

Beloved readers, I heard of this poor woman's story today and decided to lend a cyber-hand to make her life easier.

Help her out here.

"registry of homophobic acts..."

Some people wonder why I fight homofascism with such tenacity. Some people tell me that homofascism will never gain a strong foothold in my country. I call (bovine feces)!! I collect data to counteract homosexual propaganda and to defend myself and the concept of heteroseparatism against those who have a demonic desire to attack, discredit, and mischaracterize me.

Whenever I get involved in an online debate about the danger of redefining marriage, I start sending links to the information that I’ve gathered on this blog, and whoever it is that’s attacking me…suddenly disappears! The truth is an immortal weapon/shield, and whoever lives in the Truth will outlast their opponent.

Now, in Canada, where same-sex “marriage” is legal, a “registry of homophobic acts” has been started. How is this not state-sponsored homofascism?!?

“…a Quebec homosexual activist group has launched a “registry of homophobic acts” with support and funding from the Quebec Government’s Justice Department. Standing alongside Montreal Police Chief Johanne Paquin and Commander Alain Gagnon, the leadership of the group Gai Ecoute launched the anonymous tipster registry at a press conference today.

…“any negative word or act toward a homosexual or homosexuality in general…injurious mockery, inappropriate media coverage…

…anyone who has experienced or witnessed an act of homophobia “must” report it to the registry of homophobic acts.

…the Quebec Justice Ministry’s department of “The Fight Against Homophobia.” The Justice Ministry was tasked with fighting homophobia in 2008 and last year pledged $7 million to ‘anti-homophobia’ activities.

…LifeSiteNews spoke briefly with Roger Noël, the coordinator of The Office of the Fight against Homophobia in the Department of Justice. Noël refused to answer questions about the registry…

…“The compilation and analysis of these data will better identify the problem and will enable us to act at the level of prevention.”

…the registry as a “means to instill a climate of oppression and fear to anyone who disagrees with any of the opinions of the homosexualist movement in Quebec.”

…“Anyone who might believe that a homosexual act is unacceptable at a moral level” is being sent a warning “that they will end up on a list,” he said. “A list to be used for a future purpose which in my opinion is to punish.”

…“It is really about inciting a climate of fear using the media, especially with the presence of the police. Any criticism will be interpreted as homophobia and eventually down the road there will be consequences.” …”

The full story on this latest level of Canadian homofascism is here.

Aservant's article. Part 1 of 5.

The following is the story of my experience that lead me to awake to the truth about gay culture and gay behavior itself. A truth that is the exact opposite of what is being portrayed in popular culture and sold at large to an unknowing public.

I write this because I believe there is an intentional, massive fraud being perpetrated on a population that is largely ignorant about this matter due to a lack of honest discourse and direct experience. I believe that those of us that have been fortunate enough to finally be able to see through this fraud have an obligation to share with others what we have learned. It has become very obvious to me that the politically correct, “en vogue”, “gay is good” meme that currently dominates public discourse regarding this issue is not only untrue, but it is very damaging to our societal structure at large, as well as to the lives of individuals. Personally, I know now that my own ignorance on this matter caused me great spiritual damage and resulted in many years of physical hardship and exposure to very dangerous situations. I feel I was lucky to come through this process intact.


I feel it to be very important that my story be told, for I am sure that many others, unprepared, naïve and indoctrinated, will go through the same experience as myself, and it is very possible that unlike me, they won't come through intact. More importantly, I have come to believe that if the gay issue isn't discussed in an open, sincere and rational manner in the public forum at large there will be devastating consequences for everybody, both gay and straight.

But before I get to my actual experience, I want to share a few words of my acquired beliefs on this very important issue.


I want it to be known from the beginning of this story that I do not believe homosexuals and homosexuality are beyond redemption nor are they or their behavior inherently evil. This is important to state because in today's culture, as soon as one speaks critically of gay culture, they are labeled a “bigot, hater, and intolerant.” Well, as you read this true personal account, you will see that I have not been any of those, and nothing in this essay is written with any malice whatsoever. What I write here is what I have learned through years of study, direct experience, and personal observation. The issue of hate or intolerance is not anywhere in the picture. Rather, this is a discussion about the health and stability of our society, nothing more.


The most common label thrown at one who speaks critically of homosexual behavior is “homophobe”, as though this person is personally terrified of homosexuals and therefore must attack them to keep them at a distance. I have come to understand that this response, along with the others previously mentioned, is used by homofascists and their sympathizers as a way of projecting their own terror on to others about their own proclivities that they feel powerless to control. This is a defense mechanism on the part of the homosexual who feels attacked by honest discourse about homosexuality. Let me explain how this works.


This can only be understood if one understands the true nature of homosexuality and is not deceived by what is being trumpeted about gay culture in popular culture today. In today's “mainstream discourse”, being gay is portrayed as a mere “tendency”, no different than being right or left handed. But as I just stated, this is a portrayal, nothing more. It has little if anything to do with what the reality is of being homosexual, which is of course what this essay is about. I used to believe in this “portrayal” of “gayness”. Not anymore. I am now convinced without a doubt, that homosexuality is a strong behavioral compulsion akin to an addiction, and actually is a form of addiction, and an extremely strong one at that. Once I finally understood this, then the aggressive and often hateful reaction that homosexuals display when confronted about the facts of the lifestyle they embrace began to make perfect sense. It began to become clear that just like severe alcoholism or drug addiction, the subject often feels completely powerless to their desires. In the same way that certain drug addicts and alcoholics are blinded by their addiction and can't or are not willing to see how it is destroying them or those around them, so is the unrepentant homosexual. We all know of cases of intervention by others into the life of a drug addict or alcoholic that result with addict becoming extremely aggressive, even to the point of violence. My experience has brought me to believe that attacks by homosexuals on those who speak frankly about this matter is no different at all than the severe drug addict who becomes aggressive when told the truth about his destructive behavior. This aggression comes from a deep, primal fear, which is very understandable if one is to truly comprehend the psychology of severe addiction. The severe addict becomes completely overpowered by his addiction to the point that it is the central driving force in his life. It is his identity, and he literally must continue to consume a substance in order to function, or so he feels. He feels that if he were to stop consuming the substance he would surely do himself great harm, perhaps even die, and in some cases of severe chemical dependency, this is in fact the case. But those cases are rare. In most cases the addict will need treatment, perhaps experience withdrawal symptoms, but they will continue to live without their dependency if they can overcome it. And although it isn't obvious to the practicing addict, if they can conquer their addiction, they will actually live much better. This is why there exists the “intervention”. It is clear to those on the outside that the addict is powerless to their addiction and someone must act to reveal the truth about their behavior to them. They have become blind to how they live and what they do.


I believe that this is the exact same behavioral dynamic at play within homosexual compulsion. When one speaks honestly about homosexual behavior and the practicing homosexual is witness to this, it is very threatening to them and invokes a fearful and aggressive response as a matter of self defense. This is due to the fact that deep down the truth always exists, in spite of the powerful corrupting influences of the human ego with its self-deception and vanity. . When it is proclaimed to an individual about their destructive behavior they can no longer hide in the comfort of their denial. They are faced with the reality of the destruction that they are living, but as already stated above, this destruction has now “become them”, so it is as if the core of their being is under attack. If they are not ready to change or in fact have deluded themselves so deeply for so long that they see no need to change, it is only natural that they will aggressively attempt to defend themselves with a counter attack. And today, with a massive, mainstream public movement telling the homosexual that “gay is good”, he is that much more empowered in his addiction. But when one speaks openly about this destructive way of living, whether as a homosexual or a drug addict, the coping mechanism of denial that the person has employed is rendered useless in a moment. Truthful words, especially in front of witnesses, have much power. The addict had succeeded in fooling himself that his behavior is “normal”. Now, once the power of truth is interjected, the charade is over, reality is revealed, and the person is brought into account. This is a very painful, frightening experience for one who has been living in destruction.


I write this as a Christian, so for me really, this is a spiritual matter and best understood as such. The behavior I described above that likens the homosexual to the drug addict is a good example of what Christian belief calls sin. One could write an entire essay on exactly what sin is and how it is defined, but the topic of sin itself is not the subject here, so I will offer a concise definition for the sake brevity and clarity. Sin is evil behavior. And what is evil behavior, you ask? Who is to define this? According to whom? Well, I will offer this. Evil is “live” spelled backwards, and this seems to offer us a perfectly clear interpretation as to what it means. It is any force directly opposed to life. This can be actions, beliefs, philosophy or just simple words. In the context of behavior, evil is comprised of actions that lead to destruction, not creation. I have learned through direct experience, and it is this experience that lead me to believe in Christian doctrine, that there are those who act evilly because it is their nature; they are children of the dark and enjoy this behavior. And then there are the rest of us, who all act evilly from time to time, some more than others, for a variety of reasons. These reasons could be because we suffer from vanity, pride, anger, lust, weakness....the list is large. But we are not evil at heart, and we do not enjoy acting this way as a way of living, but we are weak and make mistakes.


But sometimes, one can make mistakes repeatedly and fall into sin, just like each drug addict starts with just one episode that leads to addiction. Sin in all its forms, which comes through temptation and seduction of the soul, is highly addictive and can often be very intoxicating. And again, just like hard core drug addiction, sin can be so highly addictive that it can completely consume a person to the point that they are unable to return to normalcy and perish. But sin can also be fought and overcome. I have learned this first hand.


So for me it has become very evident that the homosexual is a suffering, lost sinner, just like the rest of us, nothing more, and this has always been the case throughout time. But today there is another dimension to this issue, and that is the mainstreaming of homosexual behavior in what has been a western culture deeply rooted in Christian values for many centuries. These values of course have always held that homosexuality is not to be embraced as “normal”, but rather, homosexual behavior is a reflection of a disturbed soul and a sin not unlike countless others. Now, in what could only be described as a near instantaneous reversal of popular opinion, it is the Christian who doesn't embrace homosexuality as normal who is seen in mainstream society as “disturbed”. Progressive society today champions the homosexual simply as a “misunderstood minority.” This is completely opposite to the traditional Christian viewpoint that has dominated our culture for centuries, which maintains that we are sinners and must fight our darker side. Today's society has succeeded by and large in removing the moral question about homosexual behavior.


I will make a case in this essay that this is a dangerous development for the security and prosperity of our society. I will even go as far to say here that normalizing homosexual behavior at large in our culture may very well be the linchpin issue for its destruction. If one is to understand homosexuality in the spiritual Christian paradigm, and not only that, but in a psychological, scientific manner, what is to stop us from openly embracing all forms of sin? Why discriminate against other sin? Why don't we openly celebrate lying? Or adultery? Or theft? No, you say, that would be destructive by destroying all trust between individuals, and there is no comparison........being gay is just preferring the same sex as an intimate partner, that's all.


Is that all? My direct experience over many years has told me that isn't all in the least, not by far. I have already used the term "gay culture", and gays use it themselves, and this is correct, because there is a whole culture and lifestyle associated with being gay, especially homosexual rather than lesbian, that is very different from non-gay culture. My story will tell you about this in detail, and it is this experience that makes me conclude, without a doubt, that embracing and celebrating homosexuality is just as destructive as embracing the sins of theft, lying and adultery......just to name a few.


These may seem to be very bold statements to someone that hasn't experienced what I have, and even more so if one takes at face value what is publicly being represented as the state of current gay culture. So what would make me state such bold opinions you may ask? Especially in the social climate of today, where I will be attacked, ridiculed and hated? Well, the honest answer is a very strong conviction on the matter, one that I sincerely believe has come from God himself.


Let me tell you what I have seen......

Introducing "Aservant."

This is the avatar of Aservant.

As of today, Tuesday, 19 June 2012, heteroseparatist.com recognizes Aservant as the World's second heteroseparatist.

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Intense talks...

Beloved readers,

I am in intense talks with the author of heteroseparatist.com's first guest article/series. And I'm planning on an announcement within the next 72 hours. (Work has been beating the crap out of me and delaying production!)

APA influenced by MSM.

More info here.

More from Minnesota.

Don't use the word "Dad" ?!?!?

Talk about bigotry and intolerance! A gay couple objects to the word "dad" in a guide for raising children, and ALL references to fathers and fatherhood are removed from that guide!?!

WOW!!! This is yet another example of the denial that is the cornerstone of the gay community. To deny that it takes a male and a female to create a child is insane. Yet this type of behavior is supported by those who fear being labeled "homophobic."

Is this not insanity? How is this NOT crazy? After God created Adam and Eve, it takes a male and a female to create a human life on this planet, yet some in the glbt community want this fact silenced. And I'm called a "bigot" for walking away from this? I'm "intolerant," or "homophobic," for my heteroseparatism?

I don't associate with people who deny the truth about gender differences.

Story here.

freejinger.org

Well, here we go again.

A person that is very most probably an anti-Christ bigot said that one of my videos was banned from YouTube. That struck me as curious, since I’ve never even made a video, much less for YouTube. When I investigated the accusation, I immediately discovered that it was yet another false accusation from someone who very probably thinks that anyone who doesn’t support male-on-male sexual activity is a “bigot.”

Yet the more I clarify heteroseparatism, the more false accusations I get. That’s no surprise to me. That’s why I wrote my manifesto, to cover all of the little lies that are told about those who don’t support the glbt community.

So now I’m laying down a challenge for each person who can only attack me with a like-minded group to support them. I’m challenging anyone from freejinger.org to find a post on this blog where I have condoned proactive violence, hatred, or oppression against the glbt community. Until someone from freejinger.org can face me here, where I guarantee a one-on-one debate, the commenters on the linked-to thread above are nothing but anti-hetero bigots.

Will anyone one of those cyberjackals take me on one-on-one? No they won’t. Jackals cannot fight mono-e-mono.

Worth a thousand words...

Meet Caiden Cowger.

Although I don't agree with everything that this young man says, I am amazed at his moral clarity. The glbt community is going to try to destroy this young man.

R.I.P. Ray Bradbury

One of the greatest writers of Science Fiction/Fantasy has died. His work was brilliant.

Sexual behavior vs. religious freedom.

I wonder, could a Christian photographer be sued for refusing to take pictures of sex toys, or heterosexuals dressed up in S &M gear? Or children in sexually suggestive poses?

Same-sex marriage was not even legal in the state of New Mexico, but Elane Photography, a Christian company, was still fined for refusing to photograph a ceremony of sexual sin. Apparently, a person’s sexual activities makes them a member of a legally protected class. Is this why some people become gay? To belong to a protected group? This is why I fight homofascism and marriage redefiners. I’m fighting to protect my freedom to walk away from the glbt community. Homosexuality is not innate like gender or skin color; people can leave the glbt community anytime they want to.

“... “Should the government force a videographer who is an animal rights activist to create a video promoting hunting and taxidermy? Of course not, and neither should the government force this photographer to promote a message that violates her conscience. Because the Constitution prohibits the state from forcing unwilling artists to promote a message they disagree with, we will certainly appeal this decision to the New Mexico Supreme Court.”

...Benjamin Bull, chief counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, noted at that time, “Homosexuals got exactly what they wanted. In the marketplace of ideas, one side has now been censored. This [situation] is exactly what homosexual activists have in mind.”

...Interestingly, a subsequent poll revealed that almost half of Americans believe that Christians in the United States are being persecuted by homosexual “marriage” advocates who take legal action against them over their religious beliefs, and almost one in three Democrats believes such persecution is “necessary,” according to the alarming results of a new poll

...But 31 percent of Democrats, as well as 12 percent of Republicans and 24 percent of independents, said, “Such tactics are necessary.” ...”

Full story here.

Gay Green Lantern.

Apparently, the powers that be at DC Comics are afraid of being called homophobic, and are now allowing homofascists access to the impressionable minds of children. When will DC Comics approve of a superhero that smokes cigarettes? After all, male-on-male sexual activity is more harmful than smoking.

If I had young children in my home, Green Lantern comics wouldn’t be allowed under my roof.

“...The character is different than the more modern Green Lantern, ladies' man Hal Jordan, who stars in his own comics and is a member of an extraterrestrial police force called the Green Lantern Corps. Jordan's also part of DC's Justice League with Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, the Flash and Aquaman.

...In the current "New 52" continuity, the Alan Scott Green Lantern and the Justice Society operate in a different universe than the Justice League. Robinson said in the "Earth 2" universe, Scott is the sole Green Lantern, and "the strongest, most important super-powered character" in the world. ...”

My supporting info here.

Tolerance explained.

This is one of the pillars of heteroseparatism; leaving gays alone but, also, rejecting the concept that homosexuality is normal.

My "intolerance" is for glbt conduct, not for glbt people.

"Animus" towards gays?!?

Judge Vaughn Walker, who accuses those who support God's definition of marriage of having "animus towards gays," was also working in San Francisco, very near retirement, and stood to gain personally from his own ruling.

Yet another man in the women's room.

<---This is a man.

Since when is it unreasonable for a woman to not want to be in the same bathroom with someone who has a penis? How is this a bad thing? WHO thinks that it is wrong for a woman/female to object to using the restroom/bathroom in close proximity to a male? Apparently, there are some crazy people in this world who can’t understand this.

How can some people understand how a man/male could want to have a sexual, romantic relationship with another man, yet not understand how a woman/female would not want to be in a restroom/bathroom with an adult male?

“... “Someone saw me using the women’s public restrooms and complained,” said Braly. ...The university had offered to turn more gender-specific bathrooms into gender-neutral bathrooms. Braly filed the complaint anyway. ...”

Full story here.

The PRINCIPAL of marriage.

Today I heard an intriguing term...the “principal” of marriage. Fascinating. Two elderly people, beyond their child-bearing years, are still upholding the principal of marriage when they marry. I love gathering words that expose homofascism!

Gay men live under the exact same laws as straight men. That IS equality. The term, "marriage equality," is a marginalizing misnomer and a popular rhetorical tactic of homofascists.

Powerful testimony of an ex-gay man.

What a perfect video I have found to kick off the summer of 2012 with!

Not only do I finally have the time to sit down and blog, I’ve found a video by an ex-homosexual that covers the saving power of Jesus Christ, a miracle performed by God’s Holy Spirit, the two most common origins of homosexuality, and the gross promiscuity of the homosexual lifestyle.

At 0:50, Mr. David Arthur speaks of his seduction into the glbt community. At 6:08 he speaks of the ONLY permanent cure for homosexuality. And at 8:45, he reveals a miracle of God’s Holy Spirit.

“...He carried me through the storm and made it possible for me to tell you my own story so that I have a part in crushing everything that satan has told you and led you to believe. You have accepted complete sin as a "way of life" or a "lifestyle." And I am here to let you know that there is no "way of life" or "lifestyle" called homosexuality, or transgenderism, or prostitution, or sexual promiscuity and there is no tolerance for living that sin when in your heart you KNOW it is wrong. You KNOW that those feelings you are having are not right. You KNOW that because that is the truth. Please know that I am not telling you this to humiliate you nor am I trying to degrade you. I am doing my best to SHOW YOU the Truth.

...Did I have sexual encounters when I was a child with males older than me ? Yes I did. Was I molested ? I guess I was but I sure never refused or wanted to stop. In fact, I desired the attention as much as I could possibly get it. I was very young when I first had a homosexual experience and I was 37 years old when I had my last.

...You were not BORN that way and it is NOT okay to be that way. It is NOT okay for you to have those feelings and whoever told you that is a worker of iniquity, which means that person deviated you from what is right and true.

...From the moment I was conceived I was on a rough road. I wasn't three months in my mother's womb when my father committed suicide, and that moment changed everything in my life. I grew up in a house full of women, my two older brothers were never around so I was always with my mother, sister or female cousins. And my only two friends were girls to. I never had a father figure in my life and I may have longed for that. Is that what caused me to like the sexual advances from other boys and men ?

... It is our choices that lead us astray. We CHOOSE sin.

...Not only did I have feminine mannerisms about me but I looked very feminine also, actually I passed for a young girl very easily on more than one occasion. Once I figured this out and realized I could receive even more attention and physical encounters, I used it to my advantage very quickly. By the age of 11 or 12 I was cutting school and heading to the local mall where I would put on a little bit of make-up that I stole. I had a few very short lived relationships with other males who actually thought I was a young girl. I performed as many sexual acts for them, and with them, as I could without going all the way to keep them from finding out my "secret". When it got to the point where they wanted to take it "all the way", I just simply stopped seeing them and vanished from their lives.

...I quickly found the downtown section called Center City, where all of the homosexuals hung out. I saw how open they were about it and it was okay there. I was taken under their wings almost immediately and was part of something.

...It wasn't long before I was running away from home, staying out all night, dressing up like a woman, drinking, doing more drugs, taking female hormone shots and pills, prostituting myself on the streets all night long, sleeping in parks, motels and eventually getting arrested for numerous things.

...I had engaged in sexual activities with well over a thousand men and I had the inclination that I may be HIV+ as were so many of my friends and past lovers.

...other boys wanted to use for their own enjoyment, and I was okay with that. In my mind that contact was attention, which was affection, which meant they were showing me love, some type of love. At least that is what I would tell myself and convince myself of. Well, my experiences at Job Corps came to an abrupt end when I was called into the nurses office to be told that I was, in fact, HIV+.

...I was diagnosed with full blown AIDS while in prison and I thought I would die in prison.

...The last time I was in prison there was an officer, I forget his name, but we called him "Bishop". He was a Christian and he let you know it to. I used to talk with him from time to time and I remember him telling me that WHEN I became saved my testimony would help so many people on so many different levels and walks of life.

...That was around the time I would argue with people that God MADE me gay and I was living the life that He wanted me to live.

...with no hormone shots or pills will definitely do that. My breasts had almost gone away and so did the wideness of my hips, and I became David again.

...I wanted God in my life but I also believed that I was MEANT to be homosexual.

...I found myself having the desire to read and to listen to the Bible. Once I accepted homosexuality as an addiction, an illness, then it was much easier to actually see the sin in it. I learned more about God and then I had come under conviction of His Law. It was God's Law that put me under conviction and caused me to repent of my sins and believe on Jesus Christ. I opened my heart & soul to Him in October of 2009. I also found my father's family. I had a brother & sister who never knew I existed and a few aunts and cousins also.

...I started telling others of what God has done in my life in such a short period of time, and what He can do in theirs also.

...The quality of my life has changed tremendously and I have been able to see much more clearly what is right and what is not.

...Do you know what it means to be given up to a reprobate mind ? A reprobate mind is a mind that has become so ingrained in evil that it is not able to stop – even in its own best interest.

...it DOES get easier as time goes by. I have no desire to experience those pleasures of sin any more, I have much pleasure and joy being a man of God, knowing that I Belong, Amen. ...”

Incredibly detailed, full article here.

Preserving true marriage in Great Britian.

The info revealed at 1:38 is why I fight homofascism.

...like heroin addiction.

When I was writing my manifesto, I compared the glbt lifestyle to heroin addiction since no one chooses to became a heroin addict, but their choices lead to their addiction; homosexuality is not a singular choice, but the result of a series of emotion-driven choices.

"...I came to the conclusion that the gay lifestyle, although not an overnight choice, still begins as an emotion, sparked by sudden and/or gradual childhood, psychological trauma. And then becomes a daily choice to ignore or rebel against the normal order of human life. Homosexuality isn’t a choice, but it is still a matter of choice. ..."

Anyhow, today I found yet another piece of info to support my observation.

"...Steve Abrams, 51, understands what caused his homosexuality and resents that society and gay activists lied to him. Society has descended to the point where the State is actually foisting a developmental disorder on its citizens.


"As an adult and after great pain (I am HIV positive) I realize everything that I thought I was and was told I was is a enormous lie....[Homosexuality] is not a choice. It is a compulsion brought on by an arrested development. It then becomes an addiction like an alcoholic or drug user." ..."

Full story here.

See YouTube-banned video about Harvey Milk on "Harvey Milk Day."

I know that all homosexuals aren’t child-molesters, and I understand that most gays, would never harm a child. Yet, on the other hand, I also understand that the majority of gay men were seduced into the glbt community while being told that their sexual contact was an act of love.

To gauge their level of respect for the civil rights of others, I sometimes ask gays if encouraging a child INTO the glbt community, without the consent of that child’s parent, is okay. The answer, or lack thereof, tells me whether or not I’m dealing with a homofascist, since a person who doesn’t respect the parental rights of another is a clear danger to children.

“...“Homosexual activists didn’t like the truth that was in the video; they complained to YouTube and YouTube’s committee yanked it,” Thomasson said. “They did the bidding of the homosexual activists and apparently don’t do their research and all of these are true facts.”

“People around the world – they’re getting a one-sided and biased, incorrect picture of Harvey Milk. Harvey Milk is being called a hero and a role model. Actually, he was a sexual predator,” Thomasson said.

“It doesn’t show all of the young boyfriends Harvey Milk had. It made him look like he had only one steady, older boyfriend. It doesn’t talk about all of the boyfriends who went and killed themselves because they got AIDS and so forth,” Thomasson said.

“They don’t want the truth told about the lifestyle, about the unhealthiness of it. They continue to introduce bills that promote the lifestyle, especially Senate Bill 48 that forces schools to promote homosexual and transgendered figures and prohibits anyone talking about them in a way that affects them adversely,” England said.

“So we’re calling on parents to visit SaveCalifornia.com and get informed and keep your child home from the government and get a taste of academic freedom and opt out of all eight of California’s homosexual indoctrination laws.” Thomasson said. ...”

Original, extended info here.

Video explaining homotalitarianism .

The NAACP now?

Let me see if I can get this straight... President Obama supports redefining marriage, the NAACP can no longer tell the difference between race and sexual sin, young schoolboys are making gay porn, and, sometimes, young boys will even rape young boys.

So it's, "Invasion of the Booty Snatchers" now? Wow. I'm not buying it.

I'm sticking with Jesus Christ's definition of marriage, no matter who endorses the redefinition of marriage. The Word of God will outlast this temporary diversion from the Truth.

Pacquiao vs. homofascism.

If...twenty years ago, someone told me that a world-famous boxer would be banned from a shopping mall for stating that he supports God’s definition of marriage—something that is between one man and one woman—I would’ve thought that that person was crazy. I would’ve thought of a polite way the extricate myself from any further conversation with that person, and quietly moved away from them. And that person would never hear from me again. But now, in the absurd, homoOrwellian world that I live in, this insanity has actually come to pass.

“...During a May 12 interview with the National Conservative Examiner Pacquiao said the Bible is clear on homosexual activity and that with regard to marriage we must follow “God’s words first ... obey God’s law first before considering the laws of man.”

While Pacquiao is standing by his statements to the Examiner, he has objected that his remarks were taken out of context and that he never cited Leviticus or stated that anyone in the homosexual community deserved death.

“I didn’t say that, that’s a lie… I didn’t know that quote from Leviticus because I haven’t read the Book of Leviticus yet,” he said. ...”

Full article here, and more info here.

Obama vs. The Word of God.

I never wanted to get too involved in politics with this blog. I mean, there are enough blogs that cover politics. But just a few days ago, President Obama waded into my territory...and made me a little sad. As much as I liked Obama, and admired his intellect and poise, he has lost my vote.

I was all powered up to vote for his reelection too, but now, I’ll probably be sitting this election out because I cannot vote for someone whose words contradict what the Word of God says about the definition of marriage. "...Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”..."

Then today, as I was trying to put my dissapointment into words, I found an article that put much of my observations and feelings into words.

“...What is the object of marriage? It is for two to become one flesh. Anatomically and morally, only a man and a woman can do this. Only spousal love is properly sexual for only it provides for the protection of that at which the marital act aims both in its unitive and procreative senses.

But what about “love”? Isn’t it a bit mean-spirited not to allow people who love each other to get married, even if they are of the same gender? Love always seeks the well-being of the loved one. This is true in all sorts of love, whether between parents and children, between children themselves, or between friends. Sexualizing the love in these relationships would be profoundly mistaken since none of these loving relationships is or could be spousal in character.

Therefore, sex between parents and children, between siblings, or between unmarried friends, or between friends of the same gender is objectively disordered and will inflict harm on the parties involved no matter how they “feel.” This is the opposite of seeking the loved one’s well-being.

...Ten personal pronouns or the word “my” in one sentence. That is an impressive feat of solipsism that undergirds the moral relativism that authorizes what “is important for me” as the standard by which to judge what is right and wrong. Abraham Lincoln said that there is no right to do what is wrong. Obama and Biden are complicit in making a wrong a “right.” ...”

Original article here, and more info here, and here.

"Grease" is the word alright.

When I first saw the picture on the left, I didn't think much about it. I mean, with photoshop and all that, I have to have more info that just a picture before I stop watching movies with certain actors in them. I'm well aware that no one cares about my personal boycott of homosexual actors, and I also know that I'm not doing gay male actors any harm by not going to their movies. It's simply my personal choice to not go to their movies.

Well, my jury just landed on the runway of my mind due to this story.

True marriage preserved in North Carolina.

There's sadness in gayville today. The voice of sexual sanity has been heard in North Carolina despite the classic overuse of the misnomer, "ban on gay marriage." A much more correct term would be,"State definition of marriage."

This makes me question the validity of the polls that show an ever-increasing support for the redefinition of marriage in the United States.

Wonderful story here.

Who's bigoted and ignorant and intolerant?

"...A group calling itself “Angry Queers” has claimed responsibility for throwing baseball-sized rocks through nine church windows in Portland’s Mars Hill Church, including two 100-year-old stained glass panes. ..."

This is what got me started. This is the kind of anti-Christ hatred that pulled me away from my fiction writing projects and into blogging. I would have never thought that I would one day be a blogger but here I am now because I have so much to say about the hatred FROM the glbt community.

The Lord Jesus Christ died to save the homosexual as well as all others who are enslaved by sexual sin, and gays throw rocks at His house? Wow. Talk about ignorance. The majority of the glbt community that accuses others of hatred, fear, and ignorance, will then turn around and commit acts of hatred and ignorance like throwing rocks through the windows of a church. Has the church become their enemy by telling them the truth about homosexuality?

How come fornicators and adulterers don't gather in groups to persecute the Church? Why is it that the glbt community is particularly upset at the Word of God? Is there something particular about the homosexual mindset that drives them crazy when they hear the Truth? Once a person understands who Jesus Christ really is, and gets past all of the false teachings about the Word of God, their mind is opened to a new level of knowledge.

Story here.

The DANGER of redefining marriage.

Last week, I discovered a story concerning a sexual relationship between three men where ALL of the definitions of a true marriage were broken; the one-man-with-one-woman definition, the TWO-become-one definition, and, the definition of adult-with-adult was also brushed against.

The story was too disturbing for me to cover at first. A Facebook friend posted it on her wall, and I discovered it during a standard, morning sweep of the internet. The story gave me the creeps and I was going to leave it alone until I saw the video above. It was this paragraph sent me into a high orbit when I first encountered this story.

"... “My relationship with Mark is lover and husband. And my relationship with Vinny is lover and son—even though there’s a sexual aspect to it,” DiLuzio says. “I think the type of nurturing we both give to Vinny is more of a parental kind of guideline, as well as a boyfriend guideline.” ..."

Lover and SON!?!?! WHAT WAS THAT!! What the f*** did you say?!

Is this not proof, from the words of an active homosexual, of the link between marriage redefiners, homosexuality, child molestation, and polygamy? It's obvious to me that all those who deviate from God's definition of marriage either directly or indirectly support sexual practices that endanger children.

Those who support same-sex "marriage," don't care about depriving a child of an opposite-sex parent. Those who support homosexuality think that it's okay to tell a child that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. Those who support sexualizing, or having sex with children, obviously do so without the consent of that child's parents. And those who support polygamy refuse to see that it is mathematically impossible for a man with too many children to spend an appropriate amount of time with each of his children.

Those who cast aside true marriage must cast aside the Truth first.

The HATRED from marriage redefiners.

This video shows, without question, the hateful and intolerant spirit of those who wish to redefine marriage and silence those who disagree with them. I isolate myself from marriage redefiners. I don't associate with them. I attempt invisibility when anti-Christ marriage-redefiners appear, but when I'm cornered, I make it clear that I support the Lord's definition of marriage and I will defend my right to do so.

Dan Savage vs. the Word of God/Challenge for Dan Savage.

In the video below, that contains language that some people might find offensive, anti-Christ bigot Dan Savage calls scriptures that forbid sexual sin in the Bible "bull****." Then Mr Savage goes on to cherry-pick Old Testament verses concerning food-handling that were made obsolete by the words and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!

Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.

Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.

When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?

The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.

Gay Jay spoils day. (updated 28 April 2012)

Note, at 2:04, how the homofascist teacher launches into the classic barrage of rallying words like, "racist," "bigot," and "bully," while clearly exhibiting the behavior of a bigoted bully.

More info here.

Time capsule video on the homosexual lifestyle.

The false comparison of homosexual behavior to morally benign factors like hair color and skin color began farther back than I thought. The Word of God condemns sexual sin, not skin color or hair color.

This video (that I tried to edit in YouTube but was unsuccessful) is great because it could never be created in today’s homofascist political climate, and it covers a few great points...

How a male develops into a homosexual is covered from 9:50 to 10:18, and 13:40 to 16:20.

The distorted desire for male bonding through sexual contact is covered from 11:10 to 11:38.

The ORIGINAL respect for the minds of children on behalf of the glbt community (whatever happened to that!) can be seen from 20:00 to 21:10.

And the promiscuity of the average homosexual is covered from 8:23 to 9:00, and 16:30 to 18:30.

“...In 1967, the veteran CBS journalist Mike Wallace did what today would seem revolutionary: he hosted a 43-minute documentary that exposed the stark truth about homosexuality, speaking openly of well-established facts that have since been consigned to the memory hole of political correctness.

...the self-destructive behavior of sexually-active homosexuals, the underlying psychological causes of their impulses, and their troubling influence on American culture.

...“The average homosexual, if there be such, is promiscuous,” Wallace states matter-of-factly. “He is not interested in nor capable of a lasting relationship like that of a heterosexual marriage. His sex life, his love life, consists of a series of chance encounters at the clubs and bars he inhabits, and even the streets of the city - the quick one night stand. These are characteristic of the homosexual relationship.”

...“I had a very domineering mother, a tyrant. A very sweet tyrant, but a tyrant nonetheless,” he tells Wallace. “It was a love that I had that was kind of killing me.”

...Overweight and taunted by children, he was never allowed to develop independence from his overbearing mother, of whom he was “scared to death.”

...I’m sick in a lot of ways. Immature, childlike. And the sex part of it is a symptom, like a stomach ache is a symptom of who knows what.”

“Homosexuality is, in fact, a mental illness, which has reached epidemiological proportions,” says Socarides during a lecture. When asked by a student if homosexuals can be happy in the gay lifestyle, Socarides is unequivocal: “The fact that somebody is homosexual—a true, obligatory homosexual - automatically rules out the possibility that he will remain happy for long in my opinion.” ...”

Original story here.

Rejecting a message that supports a sinful activity.

Rejecting a message that promotes sexual sin is like racial oppression? Huh? What!?

This is what some commenters on YouTube allege. Some people are still ignorant to the difference between skin-color and sexual behavior due to the phrases "Black people," and "gay people." "Gay" defines a group of people AND a behavior, whereas "Black" only defines a group of people and does not define a behavior. If the situation was reversed, and a homosexual t-shirt shop owner refused to print an anti-gay message for a group of people, would the Government force the gay businessman to print the message that he found offensive?

More details here.

Don't say, "Ex-gay," in London!

<----This harmless ad was ordered removed from British buses in London by its homofascist mayor, Boris Johnson.

Apparently Mayor Johnson has no problems with ads by former heterosexuals, he only has a problem with ads by ex-gays.

“...Boris Johnson, the Conservative Party mayor of London, is being sued by a Christian organization whose bus advertisements for overcoming same-sex attraction he ordered pulled.

...Saying, “Not gay, ex-gay, post-gay, and proud! Get over it,” the nixed slogans were the work of the Core Issues Trust, a Christian organization that helps churches minister to those who want to overcome their temptations to homosexual behavior.

...The campaign was cleared by industry regulator the Advertising Standards Authority. It was intended to be an answer to a similar pro-homosexual ad campaign...

...Core Issues co-director Mike Davidson responded to Johnson’s action, saying, “I didn’t realise censorship was in place.”

...They okayed it and now it has been pulled.

...“It is of deep concern that there can only be one point of view and that is the point of view of individuals who are determined to push through gay marriage and apparently believe that homosexuality cannot be altered in any possible way. That is not a universally held view.”

...Johnson reacted after a chorus of rage from homosexualist campaigners, who argue that homosexuality can only ever be a natural life-long variant of human sexuality, the cornerstone of the homosexualist political schema.

...who is facing an election next month...

...The incident illustrates the growing reality that even to assert that there are some people afflicted with unwanted same-sex attraction who do not want to live the homosexual lifestyle, is now regarded as “anti-gay.”

...“On the one hand, it’s shocking, such a lack of freedom of speech, but on the other, I’m not too surprised,”...

...The climate right now, she said, is immensely hostile to anyone who opposes the homosexualist political agenda. She recounted the story of a Christian Conservative Party MP, David Burrowes, who received death threats after he signed a petition to retain the current legal definition of marriage.

...and there is growing tolerance for overtly anti-Christian rhetoric.

...“at the end of the day what it’s about is intimidation and bullying and fear” by homosexuals to silence opposition.

More/complete info here and here.