Aservant's article. Part 1 of 5.

The following is the story of my experience that lead me to awake to the truth about gay culture and gay behavior itself. A truth that is the exact opposite of what is being portrayed in popular culture and sold at large to an unknowing public.

I write this because I believe there is an intentional, massive fraud being perpetrated on a population that is largely ignorant about this matter due to a lack of honest discourse and direct experience. I believe that those of us that have been fortunate enough to finally be able to see through this fraud have an obligation to share with others what we have learned. It has become very obvious to me that the politically correct, “en vogue”, “gay is good” meme that currently dominates public discourse regarding this issue is not only untrue, but it is very damaging to our societal structure at large, as well as to the lives of individuals. Personally, I know now that my own ignorance on this matter caused me great spiritual damage and resulted in many years of physical hardship and exposure to very dangerous situations. I feel I was lucky to come through this process intact.


I feel it to be very important that my story be told, for I am sure that many others, unprepared, naïve and indoctrinated, will go through the same experience as myself, and it is very possible that unlike me, they won't come through intact. More importantly, I have come to believe that if the gay issue isn't discussed in an open, sincere and rational manner in the public forum at large there will be devastating consequences for everybody, both gay and straight.

But before I get to my actual experience, I want to share a few words of my acquired beliefs on this very important issue.


I want it to be known from the beginning of this story that I do not believe homosexuals and homosexuality are beyond redemption nor are they or their behavior inherently evil. This is important to state because in today's culture, as soon as one speaks critically of gay culture, they are labeled a “bigot, hater, and intolerant.” Well, as you read this true personal account, you will see that I have not been any of those, and nothing in this essay is written with any malice whatsoever. What I write here is what I have learned through years of study, direct experience, and personal observation. The issue of hate or intolerance is not anywhere in the picture. Rather, this is a discussion about the health and stability of our society, nothing more.


The most common label thrown at one who speaks critically of homosexual behavior is “homophobe”, as though this person is personally terrified of homosexuals and therefore must attack them to keep them at a distance. I have come to understand that this response, along with the others previously mentioned, is used by homofascists and their sympathizers as a way of projecting their own terror on to others about their own proclivities that they feel powerless to control. This is a defense mechanism on the part of the homosexual who feels attacked by honest discourse about homosexuality. Let me explain how this works.


This can only be understood if one understands the true nature of homosexuality and is not deceived by what is being trumpeted about gay culture in popular culture today. In today's “mainstream discourse”, being gay is portrayed as a mere “tendency”, no different than being right or left handed. But as I just stated, this is a portrayal, nothing more. It has little if anything to do with what the reality is of being homosexual, which is of course what this essay is about. I used to believe in this “portrayal” of “gayness”. Not anymore. I am now convinced without a doubt, that homosexuality is a strong behavioral compulsion akin to an addiction, and actually is a form of addiction, and an extremely strong one at that. Once I finally understood this, then the aggressive and often hateful reaction that homosexuals display when confronted about the facts of the lifestyle they embrace began to make perfect sense. It began to become clear that just like severe alcoholism or drug addiction, the subject often feels completely powerless to their desires. In the same way that certain drug addicts and alcoholics are blinded by their addiction and can't or are not willing to see how it is destroying them or those around them, so is the unrepentant homosexual. We all know of cases of intervention by others into the life of a drug addict or alcoholic that result with addict becoming extremely aggressive, even to the point of violence. My experience has brought me to believe that attacks by homosexuals on those who speak frankly about this matter is no different at all than the severe drug addict who becomes aggressive when told the truth about his destructive behavior. This aggression comes from a deep, primal fear, which is very understandable if one is to truly comprehend the psychology of severe addiction. The severe addict becomes completely overpowered by his addiction to the point that it is the central driving force in his life. It is his identity, and he literally must continue to consume a substance in order to function, or so he feels. He feels that if he were to stop consuming the substance he would surely do himself great harm, perhaps even die, and in some cases of severe chemical dependency, this is in fact the case. But those cases are rare. In most cases the addict will need treatment, perhaps experience withdrawal symptoms, but they will continue to live without their dependency if they can overcome it. And although it isn't obvious to the practicing addict, if they can conquer their addiction, they will actually live much better. This is why there exists the “intervention”. It is clear to those on the outside that the addict is powerless to their addiction and someone must act to reveal the truth about their behavior to them. They have become blind to how they live and what they do.


I believe that this is the exact same behavioral dynamic at play within homosexual compulsion. When one speaks honestly about homosexual behavior and the practicing homosexual is witness to this, it is very threatening to them and invokes a fearful and aggressive response as a matter of self defense. This is due to the fact that deep down the truth always exists, in spite of the powerful corrupting influences of the human ego with its self-deception and vanity. . When it is proclaimed to an individual about their destructive behavior they can no longer hide in the comfort of their denial. They are faced with the reality of the destruction that they are living, but as already stated above, this destruction has now “become them”, so it is as if the core of their being is under attack. If they are not ready to change or in fact have deluded themselves so deeply for so long that they see no need to change, it is only natural that they will aggressively attempt to defend themselves with a counter attack. And today, with a massive, mainstream public movement telling the homosexual that “gay is good”, he is that much more empowered in his addiction. But when one speaks openly about this destructive way of living, whether as a homosexual or a drug addict, the coping mechanism of denial that the person has employed is rendered useless in a moment. Truthful words, especially in front of witnesses, have much power. The addict had succeeded in fooling himself that his behavior is “normal”. Now, once the power of truth is interjected, the charade is over, reality is revealed, and the person is brought into account. This is a very painful, frightening experience for one who has been living in destruction.


I write this as a Christian, so for me really, this is a spiritual matter and best understood as such. The behavior I described above that likens the homosexual to the drug addict is a good example of what Christian belief calls sin. One could write an entire essay on exactly what sin is and how it is defined, but the topic of sin itself is not the subject here, so I will offer a concise definition for the sake brevity and clarity. Sin is evil behavior. And what is evil behavior, you ask? Who is to define this? According to whom? Well, I will offer this. Evil is “live” spelled backwards, and this seems to offer us a perfectly clear interpretation as to what it means. It is any force directly opposed to life. This can be actions, beliefs, philosophy or just simple words. In the context of behavior, evil is comprised of actions that lead to destruction, not creation. I have learned through direct experience, and it is this experience that lead me to believe in Christian doctrine, that there are those who act evilly because it is their nature; they are children of the dark and enjoy this behavior. And then there are the rest of us, who all act evilly from time to time, some more than others, for a variety of reasons. These reasons could be because we suffer from vanity, pride, anger, lust, weakness....the list is large. But we are not evil at heart, and we do not enjoy acting this way as a way of living, but we are weak and make mistakes.


But sometimes, one can make mistakes repeatedly and fall into sin, just like each drug addict starts with just one episode that leads to addiction. Sin in all its forms, which comes through temptation and seduction of the soul, is highly addictive and can often be very intoxicating. And again, just like hard core drug addiction, sin can be so highly addictive that it can completely consume a person to the point that they are unable to return to normalcy and perish. But sin can also be fought and overcome. I have learned this first hand.


So for me it has become very evident that the homosexual is a suffering, lost sinner, just like the rest of us, nothing more, and this has always been the case throughout time. But today there is another dimension to this issue, and that is the mainstreaming of homosexual behavior in what has been a western culture deeply rooted in Christian values for many centuries. These values of course have always held that homosexuality is not to be embraced as “normal”, but rather, homosexual behavior is a reflection of a disturbed soul and a sin not unlike countless others. Now, in what could only be described as a near instantaneous reversal of popular opinion, it is the Christian who doesn't embrace homosexuality as normal who is seen in mainstream society as “disturbed”. Progressive society today champions the homosexual simply as a “misunderstood minority.” This is completely opposite to the traditional Christian viewpoint that has dominated our culture for centuries, which maintains that we are sinners and must fight our darker side. Today's society has succeeded by and large in removing the moral question about homosexual behavior.


I will make a case in this essay that this is a dangerous development for the security and prosperity of our society. I will even go as far to say here that normalizing homosexual behavior at large in our culture may very well be the linchpin issue for its destruction. If one is to understand homosexuality in the spiritual Christian paradigm, and not only that, but in a psychological, scientific manner, what is to stop us from openly embracing all forms of sin? Why discriminate against other sin? Why don't we openly celebrate lying? Or adultery? Or theft? No, you say, that would be destructive by destroying all trust between individuals, and there is no comparison........being gay is just preferring the same sex as an intimate partner, that's all.


Is that all? My direct experience over many years has told me that isn't all in the least, not by far. I have already used the term "gay culture", and gays use it themselves, and this is correct, because there is a whole culture and lifestyle associated with being gay, especially homosexual rather than lesbian, that is very different from non-gay culture. My story will tell you about this in detail, and it is this experience that makes me conclude, without a doubt, that embracing and celebrating homosexuality is just as destructive as embracing the sins of theft, lying and adultery......just to name a few.


These may seem to be very bold statements to someone that hasn't experienced what I have, and even more so if one takes at face value what is publicly being represented as the state of current gay culture. So what would make me state such bold opinions you may ask? Especially in the social climate of today, where I will be attacked, ridiculed and hated? Well, the honest answer is a very strong conviction on the matter, one that I sincerely believe has come from God himself.


Let me tell you what I have seen......

Introducing "Aservant."

This is the avatar of Aservant.

As of today, Tuesday, 19 June 2012, heteroseparatist.com recognizes Aservant as the World's second heteroseparatist.

The risks of having lesbian "mothers."

Supporting info here.

Intense talks...

Beloved readers,

I am in intense talks with the author of heteroseparatist.com's first guest article/series. And I'm planning on an announcement within the next 72 hours. (Work has been beating the crap out of me and delaying production!)

APA influenced by MSM.

More info here.

More from Minnesota.

Don't use the word "Dad" ?!?!?

Talk about bigotry and intolerance! A gay couple objects to the word "dad" in a guide for raising children, and ALL references to fathers and fatherhood are removed from that guide!?!

WOW!!! This is yet another example of the denial that is the cornerstone of the gay community. To deny that it takes a male and a female to create a child is insane. Yet this type of behavior is supported by those who fear being labeled "homophobic."

Is this not insanity? How is this NOT crazy? After God created Adam and Eve, it takes a male and a female to create a human life on this planet, yet some in the glbt community want this fact silenced. And I'm called a "bigot" for walking away from this? I'm "intolerant," or "homophobic," for my heteroseparatism?

I don't associate with people who deny the truth about gender differences.

Story here.

freejinger.org

Well, here we go again.

A person that is very most probably an anti-Christ bigot said that one of my videos was banned from YouTube. That struck me as curious, since I’ve never even made a video, much less for YouTube. When I investigated the accusation, I immediately discovered that it was yet another false accusation from someone who very probably thinks that anyone who doesn’t support male-on-male sexual activity is a “bigot.”

Yet the more I clarify heteroseparatism, the more false accusations I get. That’s no surprise to me. That’s why I wrote my manifesto, to cover all of the little lies that are told about those who don’t support the glbt community.

So now I’m laying down a challenge for each person who can only attack me with a like-minded group to support them. I’m challenging anyone from freejinger.org to find a post on this blog where I have condoned proactive violence, hatred, or oppression against the glbt community. Until someone from freejinger.org can face me here, where I guarantee a one-on-one debate, the commenters on the linked-to thread above are nothing but anti-hetero bigots.

Will anyone one of those cyberjackals take me on one-on-one? No they won’t. Jackals cannot fight mono-e-mono.

Worth a thousand words...

Meet Caiden Cowger.

Although I don't agree with everything that this young man says, I am amazed at his moral clarity. The glbt community is going to try to destroy this young man.

R.I.P. Ray Bradbury

One of the greatest writers of Science Fiction/Fantasy has died. His work was brilliant.

Sexual behavior vs. religious freedom.

I wonder, could a Christian photographer be sued for refusing to take pictures of sex toys, or heterosexuals dressed up in S &M gear? Or children in sexually suggestive poses?

Same-sex marriage was not even legal in the state of New Mexico, but Elane Photography, a Christian company, was still fined for refusing to photograph a ceremony of sexual sin. Apparently, a person’s sexual activities makes them a member of a legally protected class. Is this why some people become gay? To belong to a protected group? This is why I fight homofascism and marriage redefiners. I’m fighting to protect my freedom to walk away from the glbt community. Homosexuality is not innate like gender or skin color; people can leave the glbt community anytime they want to.

“... “Should the government force a videographer who is an animal rights activist to create a video promoting hunting and taxidermy? Of course not, and neither should the government force this photographer to promote a message that violates her conscience. Because the Constitution prohibits the state from forcing unwilling artists to promote a message they disagree with, we will certainly appeal this decision to the New Mexico Supreme Court.”

...Benjamin Bull, chief counsel for the Alliance Defense Fund, noted at that time, “Homosexuals got exactly what they wanted. In the marketplace of ideas, one side has now been censored. This [situation] is exactly what homosexual activists have in mind.”

...Interestingly, a subsequent poll revealed that almost half of Americans believe that Christians in the United States are being persecuted by homosexual “marriage” advocates who take legal action against them over their religious beliefs, and almost one in three Democrats believes such persecution is “necessary,” according to the alarming results of a new poll

...But 31 percent of Democrats, as well as 12 percent of Republicans and 24 percent of independents, said, “Such tactics are necessary.” ...”

Full story here.

Gay Green Lantern.

Apparently, the powers that be at DC Comics are afraid of being called homophobic, and are now allowing homofascists access to the impressionable minds of children. When will DC Comics approve of a superhero that smokes cigarettes? After all, male-on-male sexual activity is more harmful than smoking.

If I had young children in my home, Green Lantern comics wouldn’t be allowed under my roof.

“...The character is different than the more modern Green Lantern, ladies' man Hal Jordan, who stars in his own comics and is a member of an extraterrestrial police force called the Green Lantern Corps. Jordan's also part of DC's Justice League with Wonder Woman, Batman, Superman, the Flash and Aquaman.

...In the current "New 52" continuity, the Alan Scott Green Lantern and the Justice Society operate in a different universe than the Justice League. Robinson said in the "Earth 2" universe, Scott is the sole Green Lantern, and "the strongest, most important super-powered character" in the world. ...”

My supporting info here.

Tolerance explained.

This is one of the pillars of heteroseparatism; leaving gays alone but, also, rejecting the concept that homosexuality is normal.

My "intolerance" is for glbt conduct, not for glbt people.

"Animus" towards gays?!?

Judge Vaughn Walker, who accuses those who support God's definition of marriage of having "animus towards gays," was also working in San Francisco, very near retirement, and stood to gain personally from his own ruling.

Yet another man in the women's room.

<---This is a man.

Since when is it unreasonable for a woman to not want to be in the same bathroom with someone who has a penis? How is this a bad thing? WHO thinks that it is wrong for a woman/female to object to using the restroom/bathroom in close proximity to a male? Apparently, there are some crazy people in this world who can’t understand this.

How can some people understand how a man/male could want to have a sexual, romantic relationship with another man, yet not understand how a woman/female would not want to be in a restroom/bathroom with an adult male?

“... “Someone saw me using the women’s public restrooms and complained,” said Braly. ...The university had offered to turn more gender-specific bathrooms into gender-neutral bathrooms. Braly filed the complaint anyway. ...”

Full story here.

The PRINCIPAL of marriage.

Today I heard an intriguing term...the “principal” of marriage. Fascinating. Two elderly people, beyond their child-bearing years, are still upholding the principal of marriage when they marry. I love gathering words that expose homofascism!

Gay men live under the exact same laws as straight men. That IS equality. The term, "marriage equality," is a marginalizing misnomer and a popular rhetorical tactic of homofascists.

Powerful testimony of an ex-gay man.

What a perfect video I have found to kick off the summer of 2012 with!

Not only do I finally have the time to sit down and blog, I’ve found a video by an ex-homosexual that covers the saving power of Jesus Christ, a miracle performed by God’s Holy Spirit, the two most common origins of homosexuality, and the gross promiscuity of the homosexual lifestyle.

At 0:50, Mr. David Arthur speaks of his seduction into the glbt community. At 6:08 he speaks of the ONLY permanent cure for homosexuality. And at 8:45, he reveals a miracle of God’s Holy Spirit.

“...He carried me through the storm and made it possible for me to tell you my own story so that I have a part in crushing everything that satan has told you and led you to believe. You have accepted complete sin as a "way of life" or a "lifestyle." And I am here to let you know that there is no "way of life" or "lifestyle" called homosexuality, or transgenderism, or prostitution, or sexual promiscuity and there is no tolerance for living that sin when in your heart you KNOW it is wrong. You KNOW that those feelings you are having are not right. You KNOW that because that is the truth. Please know that I am not telling you this to humiliate you nor am I trying to degrade you. I am doing my best to SHOW YOU the Truth.

...Did I have sexual encounters when I was a child with males older than me ? Yes I did. Was I molested ? I guess I was but I sure never refused or wanted to stop. In fact, I desired the attention as much as I could possibly get it. I was very young when I first had a homosexual experience and I was 37 years old when I had my last.

...You were not BORN that way and it is NOT okay to be that way. It is NOT okay for you to have those feelings and whoever told you that is a worker of iniquity, which means that person deviated you from what is right and true.

...From the moment I was conceived I was on a rough road. I wasn't three months in my mother's womb when my father committed suicide, and that moment changed everything in my life. I grew up in a house full of women, my two older brothers were never around so I was always with my mother, sister or female cousins. And my only two friends were girls to. I never had a father figure in my life and I may have longed for that. Is that what caused me to like the sexual advances from other boys and men ?

... It is our choices that lead us astray. We CHOOSE sin.

...Not only did I have feminine mannerisms about me but I looked very feminine also, actually I passed for a young girl very easily on more than one occasion. Once I figured this out and realized I could receive even more attention and physical encounters, I used it to my advantage very quickly. By the age of 11 or 12 I was cutting school and heading to the local mall where I would put on a little bit of make-up that I stole. I had a few very short lived relationships with other males who actually thought I was a young girl. I performed as many sexual acts for them, and with them, as I could without going all the way to keep them from finding out my "secret". When it got to the point where they wanted to take it "all the way", I just simply stopped seeing them and vanished from their lives.

...I quickly found the downtown section called Center City, where all of the homosexuals hung out. I saw how open they were about it and it was okay there. I was taken under their wings almost immediately and was part of something.

...It wasn't long before I was running away from home, staying out all night, dressing up like a woman, drinking, doing more drugs, taking female hormone shots and pills, prostituting myself on the streets all night long, sleeping in parks, motels and eventually getting arrested for numerous things.

...I had engaged in sexual activities with well over a thousand men and I had the inclination that I may be HIV+ as were so many of my friends and past lovers.

...other boys wanted to use for their own enjoyment, and I was okay with that. In my mind that contact was attention, which was affection, which meant they were showing me love, some type of love. At least that is what I would tell myself and convince myself of. Well, my experiences at Job Corps came to an abrupt end when I was called into the nurses office to be told that I was, in fact, HIV+.

...I was diagnosed with full blown AIDS while in prison and I thought I would die in prison.

...The last time I was in prison there was an officer, I forget his name, but we called him "Bishop". He was a Christian and he let you know it to. I used to talk with him from time to time and I remember him telling me that WHEN I became saved my testimony would help so many people on so many different levels and walks of life.

...That was around the time I would argue with people that God MADE me gay and I was living the life that He wanted me to live.

...with no hormone shots or pills will definitely do that. My breasts had almost gone away and so did the wideness of my hips, and I became David again.

...I wanted God in my life but I also believed that I was MEANT to be homosexual.

...I found myself having the desire to read and to listen to the Bible. Once I accepted homosexuality as an addiction, an illness, then it was much easier to actually see the sin in it. I learned more about God and then I had come under conviction of His Law. It was God's Law that put me under conviction and caused me to repent of my sins and believe on Jesus Christ. I opened my heart & soul to Him in October of 2009. I also found my father's family. I had a brother & sister who never knew I existed and a few aunts and cousins also.

...I started telling others of what God has done in my life in such a short period of time, and what He can do in theirs also.

...The quality of my life has changed tremendously and I have been able to see much more clearly what is right and what is not.

...Do you know what it means to be given up to a reprobate mind ? A reprobate mind is a mind that has become so ingrained in evil that it is not able to stop – even in its own best interest.

...it DOES get easier as time goes by. I have no desire to experience those pleasures of sin any more, I have much pleasure and joy being a man of God, knowing that I Belong, Amen. ...”

Incredibly detailed, full article here.

Preserving true marriage in Great Britian.

The info revealed at 1:38 is why I fight homofascism.

...like heroin addiction.

When I was writing my manifesto, I compared the glbt lifestyle to heroin addiction since no one chooses to became a heroin addict, but their choices lead to their addiction; homosexuality is not a singular choice, but the result of a series of emotion-driven choices.

"...I came to the conclusion that the gay lifestyle, although not an overnight choice, still begins as an emotion, sparked by sudden and/or gradual childhood, psychological trauma. And then becomes a daily choice to ignore or rebel against the normal order of human life. Homosexuality isn’t a choice, but it is still a matter of choice. ..."

Anyhow, today I found yet another piece of info to support my observation.

"...Steve Abrams, 51, understands what caused his homosexuality and resents that society and gay activists lied to him. Society has descended to the point where the State is actually foisting a developmental disorder on its citizens.


"As an adult and after great pain (I am HIV positive) I realize everything that I thought I was and was told I was is a enormous lie....[Homosexuality] is not a choice. It is a compulsion brought on by an arrested development. It then becomes an addiction like an alcoholic or drug user." ..."

Full story here.

See YouTube-banned video about Harvey Milk on "Harvey Milk Day."

I know that all homosexuals aren’t child-molesters, and I understand that most gays, would never harm a child. Yet, on the other hand, I also understand that the majority of gay men were seduced into the glbt community while being told that their sexual contact was an act of love.

To gauge their level of respect for the civil rights of others, I sometimes ask gays if encouraging a child INTO the glbt community, without the consent of that child’s parent, is okay. The answer, or lack thereof, tells me whether or not I’m dealing with a homofascist, since a person who doesn’t respect the parental rights of another is a clear danger to children.

“...“Homosexual activists didn’t like the truth that was in the video; they complained to YouTube and YouTube’s committee yanked it,” Thomasson said. “They did the bidding of the homosexual activists and apparently don’t do their research and all of these are true facts.”

“People around the world – they’re getting a one-sided and biased, incorrect picture of Harvey Milk. Harvey Milk is being called a hero and a role model. Actually, he was a sexual predator,” Thomasson said.

“It doesn’t show all of the young boyfriends Harvey Milk had. It made him look like he had only one steady, older boyfriend. It doesn’t talk about all of the boyfriends who went and killed themselves because they got AIDS and so forth,” Thomasson said.

“They don’t want the truth told about the lifestyle, about the unhealthiness of it. They continue to introduce bills that promote the lifestyle, especially Senate Bill 48 that forces schools to promote homosexual and transgendered figures and prohibits anyone talking about them in a way that affects them adversely,” England said.

“So we’re calling on parents to visit SaveCalifornia.com and get informed and keep your child home from the government and get a taste of academic freedom and opt out of all eight of California’s homosexual indoctrination laws.” Thomasson said. ...”

Original, extended info here.

Video explaining homotalitarianism .

The NAACP now?

Let me see if I can get this straight... President Obama supports redefining marriage, the NAACP can no longer tell the difference between race and sexual sin, young schoolboys are making gay porn, and, sometimes, young boys will even rape young boys.

So it's, "Invasion of the Booty Snatchers" now? Wow. I'm not buying it.

I'm sticking with Jesus Christ's definition of marriage, no matter who endorses the redefinition of marriage. The Word of God will outlast this temporary diversion from the Truth.

Pacquiao vs. homofascism.

If...twenty years ago, someone told me that a world-famous boxer would be banned from a shopping mall for stating that he supports God’s definition of marriage—something that is between one man and one woman—I would’ve thought that that person was crazy. I would’ve thought of a polite way the extricate myself from any further conversation with that person, and quietly moved away from them. And that person would never hear from me again. But now, in the absurd, homoOrwellian world that I live in, this insanity has actually come to pass.

“...During a May 12 interview with the National Conservative Examiner Pacquiao said the Bible is clear on homosexual activity and that with regard to marriage we must follow “God’s words first ... obey God’s law first before considering the laws of man.”

While Pacquiao is standing by his statements to the Examiner, he has objected that his remarks were taken out of context and that he never cited Leviticus or stated that anyone in the homosexual community deserved death.

“I didn’t say that, that’s a lie… I didn’t know that quote from Leviticus because I haven’t read the Book of Leviticus yet,” he said. ...”

Full article here, and more info here.

Obama vs. The Word of God.

I never wanted to get too involved in politics with this blog. I mean, there are enough blogs that cover politics. But just a few days ago, President Obama waded into my territory...and made me a little sad. As much as I liked Obama, and admired his intellect and poise, he has lost my vote.

I was all powered up to vote for his reelection too, but now, I’ll probably be sitting this election out because I cannot vote for someone whose words contradict what the Word of God says about the definition of marriage. "...Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.”..."

Then today, as I was trying to put my dissapointment into words, I found an article that put much of my observations and feelings into words.

“...What is the object of marriage? It is for two to become one flesh. Anatomically and morally, only a man and a woman can do this. Only spousal love is properly sexual for only it provides for the protection of that at which the marital act aims both in its unitive and procreative senses.

But what about “love”? Isn’t it a bit mean-spirited not to allow people who love each other to get married, even if they are of the same gender? Love always seeks the well-being of the loved one. This is true in all sorts of love, whether between parents and children, between children themselves, or between friends. Sexualizing the love in these relationships would be profoundly mistaken since none of these loving relationships is or could be spousal in character.

Therefore, sex between parents and children, between siblings, or between unmarried friends, or between friends of the same gender is objectively disordered and will inflict harm on the parties involved no matter how they “feel.” This is the opposite of seeking the loved one’s well-being.

...Ten personal pronouns or the word “my” in one sentence. That is an impressive feat of solipsism that undergirds the moral relativism that authorizes what “is important for me” as the standard by which to judge what is right and wrong. Abraham Lincoln said that there is no right to do what is wrong. Obama and Biden are complicit in making a wrong a “right.” ...”

Original article here, and more info here, and here.

"Grease" is the word alright.

When I first saw the picture on the left, I didn't think much about it. I mean, with photoshop and all that, I have to have more info that just a picture before I stop watching movies with certain actors in them. I'm well aware that no one cares about my personal boycott of homosexual actors, and I also know that I'm not doing gay male actors any harm by not going to their movies. It's simply my personal choice to not go to their movies.

Well, my jury just landed on the runway of my mind due to this story.

True marriage preserved in North Carolina.

There's sadness in gayville today. The voice of sexual sanity has been heard in North Carolina despite the classic overuse of the misnomer, "ban on gay marriage." A much more correct term would be,"State definition of marriage."

This makes me question the validity of the polls that show an ever-increasing support for the redefinition of marriage in the United States.

Wonderful story here.

Who's bigoted and ignorant and intolerant?

"...A group calling itself “Angry Queers” has claimed responsibility for throwing baseball-sized rocks through nine church windows in Portland’s Mars Hill Church, including two 100-year-old stained glass panes. ..."

This is what got me started. This is the kind of anti-Christ hatred that pulled me away from my fiction writing projects and into blogging. I would have never thought that I would one day be a blogger but here I am now because I have so much to say about the hatred FROM the glbt community.

The Lord Jesus Christ died to save the homosexual as well as all others who are enslaved by sexual sin, and gays throw rocks at His house? Wow. Talk about ignorance. The majority of the glbt community that accuses others of hatred, fear, and ignorance, will then turn around and commit acts of hatred and ignorance like throwing rocks through the windows of a church. Has the church become their enemy by telling them the truth about homosexuality?

How come fornicators and adulterers don't gather in groups to persecute the Church? Why is it that the glbt community is particularly upset at the Word of God? Is there something particular about the homosexual mindset that drives them crazy when they hear the Truth? Once a person understands who Jesus Christ really is, and gets past all of the false teachings about the Word of God, their mind is opened to a new level of knowledge.

Story here.

The DANGER of redefining marriage.

Last week, I discovered a story concerning a sexual relationship between three men where ALL of the definitions of a true marriage were broken; the one-man-with-one-woman definition, the TWO-become-one definition, and, the definition of adult-with-adult was also brushed against.

The story was too disturbing for me to cover at first. A Facebook friend posted it on her wall, and I discovered it during a standard, morning sweep of the internet. The story gave me the creeps and I was going to leave it alone until I saw the video above. It was this paragraph sent me into a high orbit when I first encountered this story.

"... “My relationship with Mark is lover and husband. And my relationship with Vinny is lover and son—even though there’s a sexual aspect to it,” DiLuzio says. “I think the type of nurturing we both give to Vinny is more of a parental kind of guideline, as well as a boyfriend guideline.” ..."

Lover and SON!?!?! WHAT WAS THAT!! What the f*** did you say?!

Is this not proof, from the words of an active homosexual, of the link between marriage redefiners, homosexuality, child molestation, and polygamy? It's obvious to me that all those who deviate from God's definition of marriage either directly or indirectly support sexual practices that endanger children.

Those who support same-sex "marriage," don't care about depriving a child of an opposite-sex parent. Those who support homosexuality think that it's okay to tell a child that homosexuality is okay without the consent of that child's parents. Those who support sexualizing, or having sex with children, obviously do so without the consent of that child's parents. And those who support polygamy refuse to see that it is mathematically impossible for a man with too many children to spend an appropriate amount of time with each of his children.

Those who cast aside true marriage must cast aside the Truth first.

The HATRED from marriage redefiners.

This video shows, without question, the hateful and intolerant spirit of those who wish to redefine marriage and silence those who disagree with them. I isolate myself from marriage redefiners. I don't associate with them. I attempt invisibility when anti-Christ marriage-redefiners appear, but when I'm cornered, I make it clear that I support the Lord's definition of marriage and I will defend my right to do so.

Dan Savage vs. the Word of God/Challenge for Dan Savage.

In the video below, that contains language that some people might find offensive, anti-Christ bigot Dan Savage calls scriptures that forbid sexual sin in the Bible "bull****." Then Mr Savage goes on to cherry-pick Old Testament verses concerning food-handling that were made obsolete by the words and sacrifice of the Lord Jesus Christ.

Just as the word "homosexual" didn't exist when God wrote the Bible through men, the word "employee" didn't exist either. In the contemporary American language of this blog, the word "slave" in Romans, in the Bible, would be "employee," since the "slaves" spoken of in the New Testament, were being paid for their work!

Dan Savage is using a very old tactic of twisting scripture to justify his homosexual sin, since the Bible condemns slavery, which was called "manstealing" in it's day, in 1 Timothy 1:8-11! And, to the Glory of God, (who exposes Dan Savage's entire argument in one verse) verse 10 condemns men who have sex with men (whom we now call "homosexuals," and no longer call "sodomites") before slave traders.

Since he had an audience of young Christians who couldn't possibly have the scriptural knowledge of a mature Christian, Mr Savage got away with mischaracterizing the Word of God and deceiving many into thinking that God is now okay with sexual sin. Notice that sexual sin is the first thing mentioned here.

When will Mr. Savage go into a Mosque and call the verses that command the death of homosexuals in the Quran "bull****"?

The original info that inspired my challenge to Dan Savage to debate scripture with me on this blog can be found here.

Gay Jay spoils day. (updated 28 April 2012)

Note, at 2:04, how the homofascist teacher launches into the classic barrage of rallying words like, "racist," "bigot," and "bully," while clearly exhibiting the behavior of a bigoted bully.

More info here.

Time capsule video on the homosexual lifestyle.

The false comparison of homosexual behavior to morally benign factors like hair color and skin color began farther back than I thought. The Word of God condemns sexual sin, not skin color or hair color.

This video (that I tried to edit in YouTube but was unsuccessful) is great because it could never be created in today’s homofascist political climate, and it covers a few great points...

How a male develops into a homosexual is covered from 9:50 to 10:18, and 13:40 to 16:20.

The distorted desire for male bonding through sexual contact is covered from 11:10 to 11:38.

The ORIGINAL respect for the minds of children on behalf of the glbt community (whatever happened to that!) can be seen from 20:00 to 21:10.

And the promiscuity of the average homosexual is covered from 8:23 to 9:00, and 16:30 to 18:30.

“...In 1967, the veteran CBS journalist Mike Wallace did what today would seem revolutionary: he hosted a 43-minute documentary that exposed the stark truth about homosexuality, speaking openly of well-established facts that have since been consigned to the memory hole of political correctness.

...the self-destructive behavior of sexually-active homosexuals, the underlying psychological causes of their impulses, and their troubling influence on American culture.

...“The average homosexual, if there be such, is promiscuous,” Wallace states matter-of-factly. “He is not interested in nor capable of a lasting relationship like that of a heterosexual marriage. His sex life, his love life, consists of a series of chance encounters at the clubs and bars he inhabits, and even the streets of the city - the quick one night stand. These are characteristic of the homosexual relationship.”

...“I had a very domineering mother, a tyrant. A very sweet tyrant, but a tyrant nonetheless,” he tells Wallace. “It was a love that I had that was kind of killing me.”

...Overweight and taunted by children, he was never allowed to develop independence from his overbearing mother, of whom he was “scared to death.”

...I’m sick in a lot of ways. Immature, childlike. And the sex part of it is a symptom, like a stomach ache is a symptom of who knows what.”

“Homosexuality is, in fact, a mental illness, which has reached epidemiological proportions,” says Socarides during a lecture. When asked by a student if homosexuals can be happy in the gay lifestyle, Socarides is unequivocal: “The fact that somebody is homosexual—a true, obligatory homosexual - automatically rules out the possibility that he will remain happy for long in my opinion.” ...”

Original story here.

Rejecting a message that supports a sinful activity.

Rejecting a message that promotes sexual sin is like racial oppression? Huh? What!?

This is what some commenters on YouTube allege. Some people are still ignorant to the difference between skin-color and sexual behavior due to the phrases "Black people," and "gay people." "Gay" defines a group of people AND a behavior, whereas "Black" only defines a group of people and does not define a behavior. If the situation was reversed, and a homosexual t-shirt shop owner refused to print an anti-gay message for a group of people, would the Government force the gay businessman to print the message that he found offensive?

More details here.

Don't say, "Ex-gay," in London!

<----This harmless ad was ordered removed from British buses in London by its homofascist mayor, Boris Johnson.

Apparently Mayor Johnson has no problems with ads by former heterosexuals, he only has a problem with ads by ex-gays.

“...Boris Johnson, the Conservative Party mayor of London, is being sued by a Christian organization whose bus advertisements for overcoming same-sex attraction he ordered pulled.

...Saying, “Not gay, ex-gay, post-gay, and proud! Get over it,” the nixed slogans were the work of the Core Issues Trust, a Christian organization that helps churches minister to those who want to overcome their temptations to homosexual behavior.

...The campaign was cleared by industry regulator the Advertising Standards Authority. It was intended to be an answer to a similar pro-homosexual ad campaign...

...Core Issues co-director Mike Davidson responded to Johnson’s action, saying, “I didn’t realise censorship was in place.”

...They okayed it and now it has been pulled.

...“It is of deep concern that there can only be one point of view and that is the point of view of individuals who are determined to push through gay marriage and apparently believe that homosexuality cannot be altered in any possible way. That is not a universally held view.”

...Johnson reacted after a chorus of rage from homosexualist campaigners, who argue that homosexuality can only ever be a natural life-long variant of human sexuality, the cornerstone of the homosexualist political schema.

...who is facing an election next month...

...The incident illustrates the growing reality that even to assert that there are some people afflicted with unwanted same-sex attraction who do not want to live the homosexual lifestyle, is now regarded as “anti-gay.”

...“On the one hand, it’s shocking, such a lack of freedom of speech, but on the other, I’m not too surprised,”...

...The climate right now, she said, is immensely hostile to anyone who opposes the homosexualist political agenda. She recounted the story of a Christian Conservative Party MP, David Burrowes, who received death threats after he signed a petition to retain the current legal definition of marriage.

...and there is growing tolerance for overtly anti-Christian rhetoric.

...“at the end of the day what it’s about is intimidation and bullying and fear” by homosexuals to silence opposition.

More/complete info here and here.

David/NOM vs. Starbucks/Goliath.

Yesterday, while I was at work, I was far from home, and I was crazy hungry. Not only that, I wanted a cup of coffee, which is rare for me.

I spotted a Starbucks and remembered their great-tasting coffee and their “turkey bacon” breakfast sandwich that I would buy about once every two weeks. But then I remembered their anti-Christ stand for the redefinition of marriage and I decided not to spend my money there. This was the third time I had refrained from doing business at Starbucks since I found out about their support for the redefinition of marriage.

Then I remembered how a homofascist told me that Starbucks received some sort of thank you from 600,000 people for their support of same-sex “marriage.” I then realized that the boycott of a true servant of Jesus Christ will outweigh the support of at least ten non-believers since the Lord is the eternal Word of God. The boycott of true Christians will outlast the temporary, emotional support of non-believers.

Then today, I read this statement...

“...On January 24th, 2012, Starbucks issued a memorandum declaring that a bill in the state of Washington to legalize so called same-sex marriage is “core to who we are and what we value as a company”. ...”

This statement has sealed my resolve to NOT do business with Starbucks, if I can reasonably avoid doing so. I know that Starbucks will probably be just fine without my money, but I also know that all those who stand for the redefinition of marriage will answer to my Lord.

More info here.

North Carolinians defending true marriage.

"Offended" by the natural/true family!?!?

This story illuminates perfectly the influence of glbt organizations in our middle schools and high schools. A mural depicting a married man and woman with their child was deemed "possibly offensive to some" by high school officials, and the natural/true family was actually painted over!

Was the mural too "heteronormative"? Was it too "heterosexist"? What straight person would be offended by this mural? Doesn't this absurd action/point-of-view illustrate the glbt community's perverse mindset? I couldn't believe the homofascist bent/flavor of this story at first, but then my disbelief turned to joy because, once again, the adverse influence of the homosexual lifestyle in our nation's schools can be clearly and easily shown. Anyone offended by a mural depicting a man graduating from college, getting married, and then having a son, is clearly a twisted individual.

This is why I no longer associate with marriage/family redefiners. A person has to be crazy to be offended by true marriage and the normalcy of this mural.

heteroadvocate

heteroadvocate:

A person, entity, or organization that speaks or writes in support or defence of heterosexuality, true marriage, heteroactivism, or heteroseparatism.

Children need their mother and father.

T-shirt homofascists.

Should a t-shirt company owned by a homosexual be forced to print a t-shirt that said,"God hates fags"? Should a Jewish-owned t-shirt company be forced to print t-shirts for a neo-Nazi gathering? Should any company be forced to print a message that they had a problem with?

If a man can be prevented from merely passing out Bibles at a "gay pride" event, can't a Christian decline from supporting an anti-Christ message?

“...GLSO wanted “Hands On Original” to print shirts for the city’s fifth annual Lexington Pride Festival. The store offered to find another company that would honor its price – but that wasn’t good enough for the GLSO.

...“Over the past 20 years, we have declined to produce several other products with different messages than the one at issue here because we disapproved of whatever message it was, and it never had anything to do with discrimination,” he wrote. “People reading this may disagree with my view on the current issue, but I hope they will join us in supporting our right to decline an order that promotes a view so contrary to our personal beliefs.”

...Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, condemned the attacks on the t-shirt company and said Adamson has as much freedom to reject homosexuality as his customers do to endorse it.

“The Left still insists that personal morality take a backseat to its radical agenda,” Perkins said. “Whether it’s a t-shirt company, wedding photographer, or the church, homosexuals will not be satisfied until they compel us to either spread their perversion or promote it.”...”

Full article here.

Alaska's prop 5.

Who thinks up these commercials? How can I get them to do a commercial for heteroseparatist.com? Apparently, the glbt community HATES these truth-filled videos.

Sexual sanity in Anchorage, Alaska.

This commercial is so quick, concise, and to-the-point that the homofascists already hate it. LOL!

APA now says gays CAN change.

The gays that worship the APA are in for a shock.

Gay & Lesbian Anger Against Disagreement.

The phrase “rhetorical tactic” captured my attention in the article from which the quotes mentioned below come from. This is what motivated me to become the founder of heteroseparatism. I was smeared and mischaracterized as a “homophobe” and I wasn’t going to let a particular homofascist bully get away with it.

It appears that a woman named Jennifer Roback Morse has had a recent experience with homofascism also.

“...GLAAD’s systematic policy of slapping negative labels on their opponents without actually engaging them in debate reduces the quality of discourse in the public square.

...Out of the hundreds of thousands of words I have spoken or written, GLAAD found a grand total of four quotes as evidence of my supposed “extreme animus towards the entire LGBT community.” One of these is that I say redefining marriage will marginalize fathers from the family, because fathers will be considered inessential. GLAAD acts as if this were self-evident evidence of anti-gay bias.

...Evidently GLAAD believes that raising legitimate questions about the group’s preferred policies automatically makes a person “anti-gay.”

...Redefining marriage raises questions that deserve to be fully aired. Trying to discredit skeptics changes the subject.

...These rhetorical tactics do not do the gay lobby any credit. In fact, responsible people of all parties should shun these strategies and make room for honest debate on this momentous question of changing the fundamental structure of our most important social institution. ..."

Full, well-written, article here.

True marriage in North Carolina.

Dumping Starbucks.

When I first heard about the dump Starbucks campaign I thought, Yeah right. As powerful as Starbucks is!

Now it looks like, not only is the "dump Starbucks" movement gaining traction, its gaining international traction.

I think that people are waking up to homofascism and fighting back. Are people getting tired of the glbt community's propaganda? Are people seeing through the misleading phrase "marriage equality," when the phrase should more accurately be "marriage redefining"?

More info here and here.

Homotalitarianism explained.

Today, while I was on the internet, I stumbled upon an explanation of the plot of the movie, "Hunger Games." As I read the synopsis of the movie, I realized that I could swap-out the word "totalitarian" with "homotalitarian," and the word "totalitarians" with "homotalitarians," and shine the light of truth on the current mindset of the glbt community!

Am I not duplicating the tactic that schoolteachers and college professors used to normalize homosexuality when the word "gay" was absurdly swapped-out with the word "Black"?

“...The people in the Capitol are not just bullies; they are homotalitarians.

The bully comes in all shapes and sizes, from the playground variety that hits you and takes your lunch to the mobster who “allows” your store to operate as long as you send in the “insurance money.” His basic goal is to make people serve him—and more importantly, to do so in a way that everyone knows who the boss is. Typically, though not always, the bully does not much care what you do the rest of the time, as long as, when he approaches, you cringe and give him what he wants.

The homotalitarian is a slightly different animal. He is a bully, for sure, but the homotalitarian impulse goes beyond bullying. It is not enough to crush his opponents, to force them to accept the fact that they are under the yoke, to put up with indignities to their persons perpetrated on them by the bully and his cronies. To be successful, the homotalitarian must make the opponent participate in the indignities. The tribal thug will force his subjects to cut off their friends’ ears in order to protect themselves. The powerful regime will count on citizens to turn in a relative who says something the regime does not care to hear—and then send them a bill for the bullets used to execute him. In the end, there will be a parade, where everyone is forced to line the streets, wave flags, and cheer. Those who refuse to do so are removed, quietly or with great show, as a lesson to the rest: you must not only accept what you abhor. You must do what you abhor, and celebrate what you abhor. Difference cannot abide.

Even the homotalitarian can come in various shades. The “bad” homotalitarian is basically an egoist. Life is the show about him, and getting his subjects to do evil to themselves or to their loved ones is just another way of making them suffer. But there is also the “good” homotalitarian, who does not believe that the things he demands are evil at all, but good, or at worst a distasteful means to a good end. He then forces his subjects to violate their consciences, to do things that they hold to be evil because, he believes, it is good for them. The true believers, of course, can see that what is being demanded is good, and are quite baffled, even angered, that those who object cannot see it as well. Such unenlightened hicks must be forced to do the thing they abhor, like children forced to eat their vegetables.

Now, it is no surprise to find that people in power truly believe that what they are doing is for the best; they hope everyone will see the truth of what they are saying and doing, and want to join in. The thing is, normal people—that is, people who are not bullies, let alone homotalitarians—propose their good news and invite everyone to join in the project: “Since we have the power to do so,” they say, “we are going to put our plan into action, because we believe it is good; we hope you will join us.” Normal people recognize, of course, that they will meet resistance, because some people will disagree with what they propose. Their opponents may even think that what they propose is evil. If the opponents are also normal, they will propose a different plan, and invite people to join their side so as to put a stop to what they oppose. One thing that normal people will not do, however, is force others to violate their consciences in order to stay out of trouble. The normal people, convinced that their path is correct and that the truth will win out, will say: “We understand that you do not wish to join us. We will not permit you to prevent our plan from happening, but we will not force you to participate—certainly not in any direct way, and if there is a reasonable alternative, not even in an indirect way.”

For the homotalitarian, this will not do. It is the sign of the homotalitarian nature of the regime to demand not only that its opponents not interfere, but that they participate and believe. It’s a zero-sum game, and the individual conscience cannot be allowed to stand as a witness, let alone in opposition. The normal person considers it a victory to get what he wants. The bully only considers it a victory if he has further humiliated his opponent. The homotalitarian does not believe he has won until everyone tells him he is right, and imitates him, and sings his praises.

The normal person who wants to use contraceptives is glad he can purchase them and use them without interference. The bully smears the name of those who oppose contraceptive use by impugning their moral integrity or calling their thinking outdated. The homotalitarian insists that even people and institutions opposed in conscience to the use of contraceptives must purchase them.

The normal person who claims to be pro-choice is glad that abortion rights have been obtained. The bully rallies the troops to force charitable organizations to donate money to abortion providers, threatening the charity’s very existence if it does not comply. The homotalitarian insists that every OB/GYN perform abortions, or get out of the profession.

The normal person who approves same-sex marriage is glad that same-sex marriage is available. The bully tries to silence his opponents by calling them bigots, and trying to shut down their businesses. The homotalitarian insists that government officials, and ministers of various faiths who oppose same-sex marriage, must nonetheless open up their facilities to such ceremonies, and even perform these ceremonies, or face the consequences of the law.

The normal person who approves of same-sex marriage, or abortion, or contraceptive use is only too happy that, if he desires, he can provide charitable services to others in the manner he thinks best, and is content to let others provide those same services in the manner they think best. The bully will shut off funding to those who refuse, for moral reasons, to provide the full range of services he would like to see. The homotalitarian will make it illegal to fail to provide this full range of services, even though far fewer people are now served, because many charitable providers have been driven out of business.

The typical homotalitarian fails to make, or even disdains, certain distinctions concerning conscience. One such distinction is that between what I must (or must never) do, and what I may do but am not required to do. Let us say, for example, that a law is put in place saying that no one may eat peanut butter and jelly sandwiches. I like PBJs, and prefer to eat them occasionally, though I am not morally bound to eat them. We would probably say that this law is unreasonable, unfair, and a serious economic blow to the makers of peanut butter and jelly and all their related industries. However, it would make little sense to say that it violates my conscience. If, on the other hand, my beliefs prohibit me from ever eating PBJs, then a law that demanded that I eat them would be a gross violation of my conscience.

The “bad” homotalitarian is often acutely aware of the difference between these situations. In fact, he often knows that what he is doing is wrong, and is counting on getting others to do it as well, so as to cover for his own evil. The “good” homotalitarian, however, is unable or unwilling to make a distinction between these situations. All he sees is that I don’t want to do what he wants me to do. It makes no difference to him whether I don’t want to eat the sandwiches, or I don’t want to stop eating them. It makes no difference whether I believe myself morally bound to eat them, or morally bound to avoid them. All these forms of my not wanting to do it are all the same. If I do what I do not want to do in the one situation (I stop eating sandwiches which I am morally permitted to consume, but not morally bound to consume), then I can jolly well do what I do not want to do in the other (I am morally bound to refrain from the sandwiches, though the law now tells me to eat them, or face a penalty).

The homotalitarian apparently figures that, if it was reasonable for the law to stop him from doing what his conscience permitted—say, buying contraceptives—because his position was not reflected in the law, then it is equally reasonable for the law to make you do what your conscience does not permit—say, buying contraceptives—because he is in power. Since his position is so clearly good, he reasons, it must be accepted by all.

One conscience, one will: this is the demand of such a regime. The individual must become absolutely one with the totality. The normal person will respect your human rights. The bully will run roughshod over your human rights. The homotalitarian needs you to repudiate your human rights.

Nor will such tactics end with one or two violations. Operatio sequitur esse: a thing can only act according to what it is. The homotalitarians of this age of the world are not petty thugs. They are intellectuals with a vision, and they will see their vision enacted, no matter who they have to run over, because they are certain it is good for you. So shut up and eat your Brussels sprouts. ..."

Original article here.

Great video find.

I don't know how old this video is, but it's great and I felt it necessary to post it.

Gays can't stifle the Eiffel.

France!? "Gay" Paree?? Taking a stand against homofascism? What the hell is going on here? Who would've thought that a stand for sexual sanity would come out of France?

A lesbian woman tried to adopt the daughter of her lesbian partner and was blocked by a very powerful court in the EU.

This is an incredible development for the liberal judges in the United States that worship all things European. I'm still reeling from this story.

Plain talk about true marriage.

Good Priest punished.

A Priest punished for following the Word of God. Wow.

In this case, the chain-of-command in the Catholic Church is apparently out of step with the Lord Jesus Christ.

As a servant of Jesus Christ, whenever a controversy concerning proper Christian conduct comes up, I go and look up what the Bible says, and I go from there.

According to the Bible, Fr. Guarnizo was right to not participate in giving communion to the “communion lesbian” because he had just received knowledge of her willful participation in a sexually sinful lifestyle.

“...Here are the facts: On Saturday February 25th I showed up to officiate at a funeral Mass for Mrs. Loetta Johnson. The arrangements for the Mass were also not my own. I wish to clarify that Ms. Barbara Johnson (the woman who has since complained to the press), has never been a parishioner of mine. In fact I had never met her or her family until that morning.

...If a Quaker, a Lutheran or a Buddhist, desiring communion had introduced himself as such, before Mass, a priest would be obligated to withhold communion. If someone had shown up in my sacristy drunk, or high on drugs, no communion would have been possible either. If a Catholic, divorced and remarried (without an annulment) would make that known in my sacristy, they too according to Catholic doctrine, would be impeded from receiving communion.

...Ms. Johnson’s circumstances are precisely one of those relations which impede her access to communion according to Catholic teaching. Ms. Johnson was a guest in our parish, not the arbitrer of how sacraments are dispensed in the Catholic Church. ...”

Full article here.

What is Democratic Underground dot com afraid of?

I have access to software that tells me where traffic to my blog comes from. Yesterday, when I noticed that there was a peak in traffic from DemocraticUnderground.com, I investigated and found out that a woman who was a member of the website had spotlighted my blog as, "...another term for bigots..."

So, when I tried to create a profile to inquire as to why the mere mention of my website was banned, I was prevented from even commenting! What cowardice!! Have I not denounced hatred and proactive violence towards the glbt community? How is it that I'm so feared? Is it anti-Christ bigotry?

Why did William 769 shut down this thread so fast? This smacks of anti-Christ bigotry.

Go ahead. Attack me...

Since I knew that I would come under a fierce attack from some in the glbt community, I designed heteroseparatist.com to strengthen under attack. All a person has to do is read the true definition of heteroseparatist, and my work is done. The more attention that homofascists bring to me, the more damage they do to their selves.

It's what I call "linguistic Aikido." I use the fury and energy of my attacker against them so that the harder they attack me, the more harm they do to their self.

Today, a homofascist calling herself, StarsInHerHair attacked me, and then a wiser homofascist realized the danger of my word/website/concept, and silenced her.

What great joy this web page has brought me!!

Homotalitarian GLAAD.

Another, once-noble-but-now-homofascist "gay" organization, is spotlighted today. To no one's surprise, they attacked Kirk Cameron for standing up for God's definition of marriage.

“...“Marriage is almost as old as dirt, and it was defined in the garden between Adam and Eve. One man, one woman for life till death do you part. So I would never attempt to try to redefine marriage. And I don’t think anyone else should either,” Cameron said.

The remarks engendered a swift counterattack by the Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation...

...but for GLAAD, anyone not of the fervent conviction that homosexuality is as natural as the rain falling is trapped in a medieval mindset and hopelessly out of step with progressive thought.

...do we really believe that any sexual urge may be satiated, that any sexual calling must be applauded, that any sexual – dare we say – perversion is permissible?

The yardstick of political correctness has subtly but undeniably been stretched from tolerance to acceptance to promotion – and now it is insistence, insistence that religious opinion and “people of faith” accept the homosexual lifestyle without question, ...

This insistence is profoundly totalitarian in scope and intent while being completely at odds with basic democratic freedoms...

No one can demand that people think in a certain way or that the only acceptable “people of faith” are the ones who won’t disagree or “condemn” your lifestyle choices. ...

...the spiritual environment described by St. Paul in I Timothy 3:1 when “some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits…”

Complete article here.

What the communion lesbian REALLY did. (updated 08 Mar.2012)

And now it turns out that she's a Buddhist! Why then did she insist on recieving communion?

I knew it. I knew it had to be a setup. It was even more of a setup than I thought. The lesbian really tried hard to intimidate Fr. Guarnizo into ignoring Church doctrine and sexual sin.

“...In the wake of international press coverage of a priest’s decision to deny a lesbian communion, and the woman’s subsequent demands that he be removed from the parish, a source close to the incident contacted LifeSiteNews with new information that he says will set the record straight. Among other things, the new information indicates that the woman did actually receive Communion at the Mass – but from an Extraordinary minister rather than the priest.

...the self-identified lesbian, Barbara Johnson, is very public about her homosexuality and is a published author of erotic lesbian material...

...Johnson had informed the priest before the Mass that she was a lesbian, and was denied communion when she presented herself in line. ...

...the priest was confronted by Johnson for the first time moments before Mass began.

...well known for his outspoken defense of Church teachings. ...

...Johnson initially came into the sacristy to discuss the details of the two eulogies that were supposed to be delivered, but left abruptly and returned with her brother and another woman, whom she introduced as her “lover.” Following this introduction, Johnson made a second abrupt exit, this time with her lover reportedly blocking the door in an apparent attempt to prevent any further conversation between Fr. Guarnizo and Johnson. ...

...Fr. Guarnizo turned her away in a manner so discreet that the Eucharistic Minister standing a few feet away did not know what had occurred. Johnson then crossed over to the Eucharistic minister’s line and was given communion. ...

...She also told the National Catholic Reporter that Fr. Guarnizo not only did not attend the burial, but also did not make an effort to find another priest to do so, and that it was the funeral director who took the initiative in contacting another priest.

...He had a migraine during the funeral, and discreetly left...

...he accompanied the body in procession down the aisle and out the door to the hearse...

...He personally arranged for the funeral director to contact another local priest, Fr. Paul Sweeney, who joined the family at the cemetery.

...“Fr knew the lady was a practicing lesbian because she came into the sacristy and introduced her ‘lover’ to Fr just before the Mass. ...

...He felt that it was a matter of conscience to deny her communion since he had been informed that she was an active homosexual by her own admission.”...

...“any person who obstinately perseveres in manifest grave sin is not to be admitted to Holy Communion.” ...”

Original info here.

Kirk Cameron vs. homofascism.

So, let me see if I can get this straight. Kirk Cameron was asked by Piers Morgan his views on homosexuality and now he’s being attacked for not supporting the glbt community. Wow.

Homosexuality is a sinful activity not a race of people, so what is the problem? How come fornicators, adulterers, and “polyamorous” people aren’t attacking him also? Why do members of the glbt community have such a big sense of entitlement? So he’s an “...accomplice to murder...” now? Really? It was this exact type of absurd slander that got me involved in the fight against homofascism.

“...and Roseanne Barr, who called Cameron “an accomplice to murder with his hate speech.”

“I should be able to express moral views on social issues,” he said, “especially those that have been the underpinning of Western civilization for 2,000 years — without being slandered, accused of hate speech, and told from those who preach ‘tolerance’ that I need to either bend my beliefs to their moral standards or be silent when I’m in the public square.” ...”

More info here and here.

R.I.P. Ralph McQuarrie

The man who created the look of Darth Vader has died.

"Ban on gay 'marriage'"?

One NEVER hears the phrase, "Ban on polygamy," when it comes to God's definition of marriage, yet, "ban on gay "marriage" is the constant drumbeat that has hypnotized the anti-Christ masses. What is wrong with some people? Until recently, in the entire history of humanity, in every culture on the planet, no romantic, sexual relationship between two people of the same sex has been recognized as a marriage. What happened to common sense on planet Earth?

God is love, and nothing that comes from God causes same-sex attraction.