Marriage redefiners harming children.

<---This guy, Warren Jeffs, believes in a different definition of marriage than the definition of marriage given to humanity by the eternally glorious Jesus Christ.

This man raped a 12-year-old girl, and says he speaks for God? NOT!! This story shows how those who redefine marriage are a danger to children.

Bradlee Dean fighting homofascism.

(Start at 0:01:48 to save time.)
Although I think that Mr. Dean here should upgrade his appearance to be a more effective servant of the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ, I fully support his fight against homofascism and the standard, mischaracterize-then-smear tactic of gay "activists."

Words such as, "anti-gay," "homophobe," "bigot," and "intolerant," are the mischaracterizing, rallying words that inspired my creation of the word "heteroseparatist," and my writings pertaining to heteroseparatism.

Pray the gay away.

Does Joy Behar really think that homosexuality and heterosexuality are comparable? Gay people have the same rights that heterosexuals do, but heterosexuals produce human beings and homosexuals do not produce human beings. It is an undeniable fact that every human being walking this Earth was born as a result of biological material that comes from a man and a woman. Am I "homophobic" for acknowledging this fact?

Very few people, if any, can be healed of their same-sex attraction without knowing and following the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ.

Ex-gay protection program.

The subject of this story confirms my observations about the origins of homosexuality; the classic story of the emotionally unavailable and distant father and the intrusive, overbearing mother.

"I don't want to be a target for gay activists," he says as we head out into the misty day. "Harassment like that I just don't need."

"It turns out that I didn't have the faintest idea what love was," he says. That's not all he didn't know. He also didn't know that his same-sex attraction, far from being inborn and inescapable, was a thirst for the love that he had not received from his father, a cold and distant man prone to angry outbursts, coupled with a fear of women kindled by his intrusive and overbearing mother, all of which added up to a man who wanted to have sex with other men just so he could get some male attention. He didn't understand any of this, he tells me, until he found a reparative therapist whom he consulted by phone for nearly 10 years, attended weekend workshops, and learned how to "be a man."

"...But Aaron scoffs at these notions, insisting that his wish to go straight had nothing to do with right-wing religion or politics—he's a nonobservant Jew and a lifelong Democrat who volunteered for George McGovern, has a career in public service, and thinks George Bush is a war criminal. It wasn't a matter of ignorance—he has an advanced degree—and it really wasn't a psychopathological thing—he rejects the idea that he's ever suffered from internalized homophobia. He just didn't want to be gay, and, like millions of Americans dissatisfied with their lives, he sought professional help and reinvented himself...."

Story here.

Look at 0:01:27 of this video.

Although same-sex "marriage" won't stop children from being born as one man in this video states, defining marriage as being between one man and one woman doesn't violate the civil rights of anyone. "Marriage equality" already exists due to the fact that everyone has the same right to marry one member of the opposite sex that I do.

Also, look at the homofascist in the red t-shirt snatch away the sign of the true marriage supporter, at 1:27. Is it my imagination, or is it true that homofascists only attack people that look like they can't defend themselves?

New Yorkers powering-up to take back their right to vote.

"Back room tactics were rampant in the passage of this law," Staver wrote in a statement announcing Liberty Counsel's assistance in the filing of the suit. "New York law requires that the government be open and transparent to keep political officials responsible. When government operates in secret and freezes out the very people it is supposed to represent, the entire system fails. … The law should be set aside and the process should begin again to allow the people a voice in the process."

For more info click here.

R.I.P. Amy Winehouse.

I didn't think that her life would unfold in a positive way when she sang about her dedication to drugs in her song "Rehab." What a sad and unnecessary loss.

Move over Vaughn Walker.

<----Lesbian Judge Barbara Lenk is off to a bad start. She wasn't even a State Supreme Court Judge for a week before lending the prestige of her office to anti-hetero activism.

"...Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Justice Barbara Lenk, widely heralded as the first openly "gay" judge on the state's top court, spoke at a homosexual advocacy group's fundraiser only two days after her confirmation, a move some critics are saying is a clear violation of (see page 8) judicial ethics. ..."

New Yorkers standing up for marriage.

I didn't think that New Yorkers were going to let their right to vote on the definition of marriage be taken away from them. This video shows that there are still people in the Empire State that have sexual sanity.

Savage bullying.

Yet again I offer proof that "tolerance" is a one-way street in the glbt community.

In any conflict between two entities, the wrongdoer wants to silence his opponent, but the person who is right wants his opponent to speak, so that all may see where his opponent is wrong. For example...

"...Just this past May, Savage demanded that a Canadian politician “Suck my d***, John.” That politician’s crime? He held an opposing position on the gay agenda. Five months earlier, in a single Newsweek article, Savage said “F**K John McCain,” and called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a “c**ksucker.”

And the anti-bullying activist has no qualms about trying to bully media outlets into removing conservative voices from the air. In 2010, he told CNN’s Kyra Phillips:..."

My supporting info is here.

Ex-gay Steven Bennett speaks to Joy Behar.

You can tell that this guy used to be a spotlight homosexual by how he walks over his wife's conversation as she is talking, and he makes the classic mistake of referring to homosexuality as a singular choice instead of the result of a string of choices. Also, look at how uncomfortable Ms. Behar is at the mere mention of "ex-gay."

Y.A.H.I. (YAW-he)

<---These people want to redefine marriage, but the glbt community won't support them. Wait...hold on a minute. Waaa? Weren't the polygamists the first social group that wanted to redefine marriage in the United States of America? Is this yet another homofascist inconsistency? A "yahi"?

"...Pro-family activists have long warned that redefining marriage to include two men or two women would inevitably lead to legalized polygamy, with polygamists employing the “equality” and “consensual” rhetoric of the gay rights movement. However, gay rights commentators immediately distanced themselves from the polygamists’ suit, with one prominent commentator calling it “a political gift to anti-gay groups nationwide.”..."

Yahi story here.

Give gays puzzles!

“The design of the human body is screaming to us, that its two halves, the male and the female, were made to be combined together in pairs, not simply on the sexual level but on all levels, and when I say this, I am not expressing a mere sentiment, but stating a fact –just as a person is stating a fact when they say that a lock and its key are one mechanism, or that a violin and a bow are one musical instrument; the male and female are designed to come together, and function as a single organism." - C.S. Lewis

Where anti-hetero SB 48 went wrong.

Some few days ago, while I was in comment-combat, a man (who was probably a homofascist judging by the gist of his comments) challenged those who don't support the glbt community to read the actual language of SB 48, which I, of course, did, and found the following paragraph...

"...Native Americans, African Americans, Asian Americans,
Pacific Islanders, European Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
transgender Americans, and members of other ethnic and cultural
groups, to the economic, political, and social development of
California and the United States of America, with particular emphasis
on portraying the role of these groups in contemporary society. ..."

Once again, the advantages of being a forensic heteroseparatist have paid off. The paragraph above shows how sexuality and sexual behavior are deceptively elevated to, and categorized with, the innate aspect of a person's skin color. It's the same old story once again. The sad, absurd comparison of race to sexual behavior. This mischaracterization has led to the legal trampling of the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual misconduct of the glbt community.

Christian parents' rights outlawed in California's public schools.

As of today, with Governor Jerry Brown's signing of SB 48 into law, a parent who has a child in the public school system in California, can NOT exclude their child from a class in which homosexuality is portrayed as a normal sexual activity.

The violation of the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community is now legal in California's public schools.

Also, it is now illegal to say anything "negative" about homosexuality in California's public school system. This very blog is now illegal in California's public schools. A Bible is now illegal in CA's schools. Quoting scripture from the Bible that tells the truth about homosexual sin is now illegal in Homofornia's public schools. Is the word,"heteroseparatist," now illegal in the Golden State's public schools too?

Who can deny that SB 48 violates the parental rights of those who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community? Is there anyone out there who is so crazy that they think that this legal trampling of the civil rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents is a good thing?

Today, 14 July 2011, homofascism has been embraced by California's government. My supporting info is here. <---The 6000+ comments on this story that were 96% pro-hetero were removed by the San Francisco-based (go figure!) software company DISQUS.

(Info on home-schooling is here.)

Savaging marriage.

The Colbert Report
Get More: Colbert Report Full Episodes,Political Humor & Satire Blog,Video Archive

Marriage was founded by God himself in the Garden of Eden. It is to be between one man and one woman, and the married couple are not to have sexual relations with anyone except each other. Sex outside of marriage will lead to great emotional pain at the very least.

This is heart-wrenching to me. Dan Savage is laughing his way into the wrath of God. Mr. Savage won't be laughing when he's standing before Jesus Christ. This is a prime example of how the acceptance of same-sex "marriage" will adveresely affect true marriage; those who accept same-sex "marriage," will accept adultry. And it is still adultry if your spouse consents to you having sex with another person.

God clearly tells us to honor marriage.

homoetiology

homoetiology: The unique experiences of a person that causes them to embrace homosexuality.

Today I stumbled across a well-written post by a man calling himself "rjligier," here, and I was inspired to create "homoetiology."

(The links in the quote below are my doing.)

"...It quite obvious to anyone who understands the difference between race and neuroses. Race is an immutable characteristic whereas sexual behavior is a manifestation of the etiology of abuse specific to one's psychopathology. The liberal bodies of the APAs and the ABA have been systematically trying to normalize neurotic behavior and its associated paraphilias to children and the uneducated masses since the revision of the ALIMPC in 1955. Only recently has the electorate been paying attention to what can only be described as collusive litigation by the aforementioned parties when they have been unable to convince or control the state legislatures. ..."

Will parental rights be outlawed by gays in California's Government?

Since when did a person's sexual activities become a part of teachable history? Is it important for California's schoolchildren to know what historical figures did in bed? Why do some people want children to be taught about the sexual activities of adults, outside of the normal process of where babies come from?

How is it wrong for parents to want to opt their children out of classes that teach non-reproductive sexual acts to their children? Who in their right mind would want to outlaw parental rights? Can't anti-bullying classes be taught to children without glorifying homosexuality? Are the glbt community and their worshippers so far gone that they support the trampling of the parental rights of Christians, Jews, Muslims, and others that won't support the sexual activities of the gay community?

Will I ever stop asking questions and post a link to my supporting info?

Revisited video.

I think that I have posted this video before, but I don't feel like doing the research and this video has resurfaced. My motivation for creating the word "heteroseparatist," can be seen at 3:58 in this video.

I also want to note that, according to the Word of God, heterosexuals who embrace sexual sin are two groups to be excluded from God's eternal Kingdom, before homosexuals. My info is here. This is why I worship and serve the eternally glorious Lord Jesus Christ, His written word obliterates the arguments of the evil one and his followers.

Misconduct in New York Senate creates gay "marriage."

Politicians are so homophobic (afraid of the gay community) now, that they will break the law to show how gay-friendly they are. This is how same-sex "marriage" became legal in the empire state.

“...King explained that turmoil on the Senate floor erupted after senators discovered that they were barred from explaining their votes. Same-sex “marriage” proponent and Democrat Senator Kevin Parker, who disclosed what happened at the Senate to the Gazette, was one of them.

“I go to the door, and I tried to leave, and they had us locked in. I tried to leave, and they had us locked on to the floor,” Parker told the Gazette. After he made it out of the chamber, he continued, “One sergeant of arms physically grabbed me....”

Story here.

Supporters of true marriage threatened.

So merely supporting God's definition of marriage makes some in the glbt community want to kill and rape?

Among the documented threats:
• "I will kill you and your family."
• "Oh my God, This woman is so f---ing stupid. Someone please shoot her in the head, again and again. And again."
• "I'm going to kill the pastor."
• "If I had a gun I would have gunned you down along with each and every other supporter…"
• "We're going to kill you."
• "You're dead. Maybe not today, maybe not tomorrow, but soon … you're dead."
• "I'm a gay guy who owns guns, and he's my next target."
• "I warn you, I know how to kill, I'm an ex-special forces person."
• "Get ready for retribution all you bigots."
• Burn their f---ing churches to the ground, and then tax the charred timbers."
The evidence included churches marred by graffiti, swastikas on lawns and walls, bricks thrown through windows and doors, adhesive poured into locks, suspicious packages of white powder sent in the mail – "all for nothing more than supporting traditional marriage."

Story here.

Is SSM in New York legal?

I've never seen a Governor sign a new law into existence so fast. It appears that the legislature of New York illegally cut a few corners to redefine marriage and bypass the vote of the people.

I think that people are starting to see the difference between race and sexual behavior when the glbt community compares the definition of true marriage to the historic oppressions suffered by African-American people in the United States.

“...At the very least, the procedure for passage of same-sex marriage in the New York Senate contravenes the principles underlying the constitutional provisions noted above. Those provisions attempt to secure an open, transparent and deliberative process. By contrast, the procedure followed to get the same-sex marriage bill through as quickly as possible was characterized by secrecy, curtailed discussion and top-down control. The important changes to the bill's religious exemption were not only not explored at any length, but the attempt of Senator Ruben Diaz to ask questions about these provisions (which had only become public a few hours before) was completely foreclosed. ...”

The facts that show how the legislators of New York broke some little-known laws to redefine marriage are here.

Where does the redefinition of marriage end?

Click on the yellow bubble.

Redefending ex-lesbian Lisa Miller.

I withdrew my support of this woman, Lisa Miller, because she was defying a court order.

Now there is evidence that this woman's former lesbian lover had forced Ms. Miller's daughter, who was only five years old at the time, to bath naked with her.

Would I defy a court order to prevent my five-year-old son from being taken away from me and forced to bath naked with a gay man, by that gay man? Oh yes I would! Navy Seal Team 6 wouldn't be able to take my son away from me without killing me first.

“... “I asked her what happened. She said, ‘Janet took a bath with me.’ I asked her if she had a bathing suit on. ‘No, Mommy.’ She had no clothes on and it totally scared Isabella. She had never seen this woman except once in 2 ½ years and she takes a bath with her.” ...”

Story here.

Spotlight on Rusty Blustering.

I said I would do this so I'm doing this. Click on comments here.

Sweden's "gender madness."

A little Swedish boy in preschool walks up to his teacher and asks,(in Swedish) "Miss Svensson. Is my father here yet?"

Miss Svensson's face contorts into an angry expression, and she yells at little Olof, telling him to stand in the corner until his "parent" comes to pick him up.

Hurt and confused, little Olof walks away and stands in the corner crying until his "parent" arrives to pick him up from preschool.


What was Olof's crime? Having the sheer nerve to acknowledge the gender of his father! This present-day, absurdist-reality scenario is being played out in at least one pre-school in Sweden, where the mere mention of a person's gender is discouraged!

"The kind of things that boys like to do - run around and turn sticks into swords - will soon be disapproved of," he said. "So gender neutrality at its worst is emasculating maleness."

“...Director Lotta Rajalin notes that Egalia places a special emphasis on fostering an environment tolerant of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered people. From a bookcase, she pulls out a story about two male giraffes who are sad to be childless - until they come across an abandoned crocodile egg. ..."

Incredible story here.

A robbery in New York.

So what's new about a robbery in New York you say? The sheer scale of this robbery.

Every registered voter in the state of New York was robbed of their right to vote on the definition of marriage in their state. Not only that, the robbers were so smooth that there are some that approve of this attack on democracy.

"... "The people of New York were robbed of the right to vote directly on this issue, and the legislature forced this on the state," he tells OneNewsNow. "And really, the blame lies with the Republican Party -- for those four Republicans deciding to abandon the principles of the Republican Party and betray their voters. That's what happened, and they're going to be held accountable."

"The poll shows that 57 percent of New York voters believe marriage should be defined only as one man and one woman," says Gallagher, "and that in addition, the vast majority -- I think it was close to 60 percent -- said that they think the people of New York should have the right to decide this issue, not the legislature." ..."

Story here.

How Matthew Shepard REALLY died.

It's been said that a lie can get around the world before the truth can get its shoes on.

Today, I stumbled upon information that the man primarily responsible for Matthew Shepard’s death was a man named Aaron McKinney, a member of the glbt community. Incredible.

"...21-year-old Matthew Shepard was picked up by two other 21-year-old guys at a bar the night of his beating. Aaron McKinney and Russell Henderson were doing methamphetamine and were looking to rob Matthew Shepard who was drunk at the bar. While Henderson was driving, the story goes, Shepard made a pass at McKinney by touching his leg. At this point, McKinney, who’d been awake for a week on meth, lost it and hit Shepard with a pistol. Soon after, he told Henderson to pull over, and the beating at the fence proceeded.

Initially, McKinney used the “gay panic defense” to suggest that he lost his mind when Shepard made a pass at him, but we later find that McKinney was a bisexual who actually knew Matthew Shepard. Did he really panic when Shepard made a pass at him or did he react violently out of anger that Shepard was in the process of outing his secret homosexual life in front of Henderson? Henderson, by most accounts, was just the wheelman who tied Shepard to the fence and didn’t do enough to stop McKinney who was out of his mind on meth.

Tom O’Connor, the limo driver who Shepard occasionally hired, had a lot to say. He knew both Matthew Shepard and Aaron McKinney. He said that a few days before his death, Sheppard told him that he’d discovered he was HIV positive, which is something many homosexuals discover. He’d also claimed that McKinney was definitely bisexual because he, himself, had participated in a three-person sex act with McKinney. McKinney’s girlfriend also suggested that McKinney had repeatedly tried to get her to let one of his male friends join them in their escapades. ..."

This story is a bit of a read, but the information in it (including how Matthew Shepard's killer became gay) is shocking.

Ciscohomofascism.

If it's wrong to fire someone for being gay or for their support of same-sex marriage, isn't it also wrong to fire someone for their support of true marriage?
This man was fired for his support of true marriage.

"..."The guy who saw the book never read it -- he just didn't like the fact that I was against same-sex marriage," Turek tells OneNewsNow. "And he told the in-charge director there about it and they fired me within hours, without ever even looking at the book or even ever asking me a question. They just fired me without ever talking to me."

Turek says he challenged Nagel about how he could be fired for embracing a conservative worldview which was never discussed in the workplace, but contends he was only given platitudes about the "inclusive" work environment of Cisco.

"She wouldn't recognize the fact that there is a systemic problem in the culture -- it's not inclusive and diverse," Turek argues. "'Inclusion and diversity' only means if you agree with us, you'll be included. That's not inclusion -- and it's certainly not diversity." ..."

Story about anti-Christ bigotry here.

The gay-friendly skies above San Francisco.

Apparently, in San Francisco’s International Airport, you can board and fly US Airways in your underwear...but ONLY if you have a gay
<----appearance. If you are NOT gay, you will be held to a higher standard.

Apparently, US Airways is more afraid of being called “homophobic” than being called racist. Yet another difference between race and sexual behavior. Sick, sad story here.

Cat impersonating a dog.

Sex "change" regret.

Well. This one's kind of predictable to those with sexual sanity...

This man, Walt Heyer, thought he wanted to be a woman, had his dingus surgically removed, then realized that he made a terrible mistake. He is now in love with and married to a woman, and trying to prevent other, pre-op, male-to-female "transgenders," from making the same mistake that he did.


Walt Heyer writes...

"... Changing genders is zany, exciting and fun at first, but many of us have discovered right away or years after changing genders that our lives turn to disappointment, sorrow and regret. The evidence of this extreme regret can be found in the staggering suicide rate for transgenders, reported to be 30 to 40%.

I am back to living as a male and I am happily married to a woman. But anatomically I'm not a male; I can't be. My birth record was changed and says female. My passport says male. This surgery is absolutely destructive. In fact, it is categorically impossible to change someone's gender.

There are a lot of males without male genitalia who are struggling terribly with this. And at least fifty percent of these surgeries are failures in some way. Your body is mutilated. It's not a good thing. It's a horrible thing.


Homosexuals, lesbians and transgenders were not born that way, no, not at all. Despite an enormous amount of research being done, no scientific evidence can be found to substantiate this view, yet it is reported as fact. My new book, Paper Genders, provides a well-researched look in the homosexual activist movement and how everyone, including the media, runs and hides from this group of bullies and sexual predators.

The question is: Who has the courage and conviction to stand up for our young kids and our families? ..."


In my internet manifesto, I cover how childhood experiences launch a person into the glbt community. Mr. Walt Heyer's experience in the glbt community supports the information in my manifesto. Then there's his news concerning the shocking statistic that a "transgendered" person is 25 times more likely to attempt suicide than a heterosexual.

My supporting data is here, and here.

The difference between race and homosexuality.

A person's sexuality can change; there are ex-gays in this world. Gender and skin color are innate, but, in the wrong circumstances, a person's sexuality can change from it's normal state.

Homofascists are now intentionally trampling the civil rights of parents by telling children in public schools that homosexuality is innate, WITHOUT parental consent. The African-American civil-rights movement didn't go after people's children behind the backs of their parents.

A Gay Girl in Damascus? NOT!!

What's the problem here? Isn't every man essentially a lesbian (happily) trapped in a man's body? I haven't laughed like this in weeks! Click here for more.

The gay Empire Strikes Back.

<---HomoSith Judges Vaughn Walker (seated) and James Ware.

The first sentence that came to my mind when Judge James Ware upheld Judge Vaughn Walker's self-serving prop 8 ruling was...

"So this is how liberty dies. With thunderous applause." -Padme Amidala/Episode III

Once again, the false comparison between race, gender, and sexual sin has eclipsed the fact that Judge Walker stood to gain personally from his decision to throw out the legal votes of over seven million Californians.

"...In his 19-page decision — a response to the first attempt in the nation to disqualify a judge based on sexual orientation — Ware had a bigger message. Gay judges, he said, are just like minority and female jurists: They can be impartial, too, even in cases that might affect them. .."

Homosexuality is a state of mind/emotion, and membership in the glbt community is voluntary, it is not innate like the gender and skin color that comes with birth. Although homosexuality is not an overnight choice, being "gay" is a matter of choice; the end result of a series of choices, like heroin addiction. Although I recognize that a heroin addict has all of the same civil rights that I do, I will not support the lifestyle of a heroin addict as I do not support the glbt community. Nor do I hate the heroin addict since I know how they became an addict.

Seeing homosexuality as innate is where Judge Ware(-is-his-common-sense!) got it wrong. Info here.

Polygamous Federal Judge redefines marriage.

If you replace the word "gay" with "polygamous," how wrong it would be if a Federal judge that was in a sexual, romantic relationship with multiple women, threw out a majority vote that defined marriage as being between one man and one woman, right before his retirement?

How long would his decision stand since he clearly benefits from his own judicial decision? Would I be called "polyphobic" for speaking out against his obvious misconduct? Weren't the Mormons stopped from practicing polygamy by the American law the defines marriage as being between one man and one woman? Do the members of the glbt community consider themselves above the law?

Story here and here.

Gay Irish Presidential candidate supports pedophilia.

This man, Mr. David Norris, thinks that a child should be able to consent to having sex with an adult. Although I know that all gay men aren't pederasts or pedophiles, I also know that many homosexual men desire sex with young, if not underage, boys. From what I've seen, there are more homosexuals that support pederasty than those that don't. And it does stand to reason that adults that abandon sexual boundaries are a greater danger to children than those that don't. That's just common sense.

Story here and here.

Challenging homofascism and homosexism.

<-----This is the core goal of the glbt community. It's not even hidden anymore. It's not even deniable anymore. Violating the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual activities of gays, is the prime goal of the glbt community. How can the gay community and their worshippers cry out so loudly about the civil rights of gays and then turn around and so blatantly violate the rights of Christian, Jewish, and Muslim parents?

Parents whose children attend this Canadian school do not have the option of excluding their children from this indoctrination of sexual sin. I have no conversation for those who support this trampling of parental rights. How would the glbt community react if classes that taught Christian principles to their children were mandatory? Are any gay people even embarrassed about this?

Homofascists attack N.Y. State Senator Ruben Diaz.

Homosexual activists want to kill him and "sexually assault" his daughter because New York State Senator Ruben Diaz stands for Jesus Christ's definition of marriage; which is between one man and one woman.

How is this not homofascism? How is this not homointolerance? What kind of a society do I live in where a man's life and daughter are threatened because of his stand for sexual sanity? What percentage of the glbt community supports the murder of Senator Diaz and the sexual assault of his daughter?

“...The entire campaign to enact same-sex marriage is conducted under a banner of acceptance, and equality and respect for others,” Barnes continued. “Yet behind that banner of tolerance is another campaign – of intimidation, threats and ugliness. What at first appears to be simple juvenile behavior by a few is becoming a culture and climate of abusiveness toward those who disagree. ..”

Story here.

The gay Trojan horse.

Who in their right mind would disagree with the phrase, "anti-bullying"? No one right? I mean bullying is something that we all can relate to. Everyone has experienced bullying in some way or another. This very blog came into being as my response to anti-Christ, anti-hetero, homofascist bullying that I encountered on a chat website.

That being said, I also know(most of the time), when someone is trying to sell me Trojan horses**t. "Anti-bullying" is now the phrase that slays the civil rights of parents that don't support the sexual antics of the glbt community.

"...While bullying is harmful and always has been, it is an even greater harm that anti-bullying policies have been hijacked by a political agenda for the purpose of promoting homosexual behavior and insulating it from public debate and discussion. Forbidding debate about homosexual behavior in schools attacks our country’s rich tradition of encouraging the open examination of ideas. Sometimes that discourse is uncomfortable and even offensive, testing the very foundation of our identity. But in the end, it is the only way for the truth to prevail. .."

"...We should not confuse acts of intimidation and violence with legitimate debate, on or off the playground. And we should not shroud censorship and political correctness with anti-bullying policies designed to intimidate opposition into silent submission. .."

My supporting evidence is here.

Classic homointolerance.

This is a classic example of the, support-homosexuality-or-else mindset of most of the glbt community. If the situation was reversed, and someone attacked an anti-Christ, pro-gay banner, they would be tackled to the ground by police. I'll bet that the homofascist attacker is never prosecuted for his actions either, like an "anti-gay" person would be if the situation was reversed.

If, twenty-five years ago, someone had taken me to into the future and shown me this event, I would've thought, Why is this group stating the obvious about marriage? And, Is this guy (the attacker) some sort of deranged polygamist or something?

More info here.

Letter by an ex-gay to his dad.

In my Internet manifesto, I write about the "Stockholm" homosexual; the gay man/male who was seduced into homosexuality by an older homosexual. I also cover how misbonding with his father can put a young boy on the path to the glbt community. The following letter, written by a former homosexual illuminates some of the strongest points of my Internet manifesto.

Dear Dad,

I need to read this important letter I have written to you in order to explain some important things about my life, the love and respect I have for you, and (in spite of that love and admiration) the disconnection I have felt from you throughout my life. I am so thankful we have this time to be together on this trip so I can share my authentic feelings with you. I am hopeful that this will be a powerful experience for both of us and lead us to a much deeper and more fulfilling relationship. Please let me finish the letter before we discuss the individual parts of it.

Dad, let me start off by reminding you of the conversation I shared with you and mom two years ago when I revealed my sexual abuse as a child and alluded to struggling with same sex attraction (SSA). As you may, or may not, know there are several precipitating factors (or constellation of variables), which create the environment where a person adapts his romantic emotions toward those of the same sex rather than those of the opposite sex. One of the essential risk factors leading to same sex attraction is sexual abuse, something that occurred to me at age of 4. That event gave me a misguided understanding about love and actually directly contributed to something called "defensive detachment"—something I learned about in my healing work. "Defensive detachment" occurs when a child disidentifies from his father, based on actual or perceived rejection. Let me explain how this concept applies to our relationship.

When my Uncle invited me to perform oral sex on him, as a 4 year old, I thought it was fun and thus internalized a belief that performing such an act on a man's penis is what love must be about. A few years later, I was with you and you were casually peeing in front of me. Seeing your private part exposed brought my childish mind back to the sexual abuse (which I did not perceive as abuse.) I immediately went to you, hugged you, and said, "I love you, Daddy." Clueless as to why I was doing that while your private part was exposed, and obviously wanting to make sure that you did not pee on me, you pushed me away and said something to the effect of "not now son!" I misperceived that very correct behavior on your part as your rejection of me. In turn, that event was a contributory factor in my defensive detachment of you.

However, my misperception of your statement was not the only factor involved. Dad, while I was growing up, I never really felt truly connected or close to you. Indeed, being emotionally distant from you was not what I really wanted—I wanted to feel and be close to you. Unfortunately, I can't remember if I ever expressed that to you (other than at age 5 or 6 when I was pushed away).

Objectively, you were never a "bad father." You spent a great deal of time supporting the family ... although I perceived your focus on work as a neglect of me. You were gone a lot from the home. Even when you were home, I did not perceive you as being there for me. You would be on the phone or paying attention to something else. Not perceiving your emotional presence, I further detached from you as a defensive reaction to avoid pain and perceived further emotional rejection or wounding. Even when you had time to make it to the occasional camping trips we took, we still never authentically connected. Eventually I stopped seeing you as my Dad, the person to whom I could go to for emotional support, and more simply saw you as just the man with whom I shared a house.

We did share a handful of common interests so we could do something together that both of us would enjoy, but even then, we still had difficulty authentically connecting. And in many cases, your efforts to work with me or teach me masculine skills had the opposite effect. For example, because I lacked a great deal of interest in sports, your efforts to bond with me on a basketball court or on a golf course further separated us rather than bring us closer together. In many cases, your active and excitable personality (which in most cases may be seen as a positive characteristic) was mistaken by me for anger directed toward me. Thus in an effort to protect myself further, I detached even more, drawing further away from you. While I now appreciate how determined you were to teach me how to ride a bike, my timid nature made me afraid to do so and at that time I misperceived your behavior as disapproval directed toward me.

I know you never intended to push me away. You never intended that the lack of a deep relationship between us would contribute to the difficult burden I carry today. This is not your fault because you didn't intend for this to happen. What I want you to know is that I have been searching for something I felt I was lacking in every male friendship I've had. I always said I wanted a best friend. I have always (and in some ways continue) to look for that. Sadly, the truth goes deeper; I wasn't just looking for my friends we left in Pennsylvania or someone I could trust, in truth, I was really looking for what I missed in you.

Sometimes my heart was hardened towards you. Sometimes I was just apathetic. At this time, I want you to know my heart honors you and is open toward you. I want the hills and witnesses to echo this truth: Dad, I forgive you. I forgive you because I love you. I forgive you because I've forgiven myself. I forgive you because I honor you.

To forgive you and to forgive myself is absolutely essential if we are to truly connect as father and son. It permits my inner child to make whole once again what was broken and to make clean what was soiled. Forgiveness is more than reconciliation. It permits me to let go of the resentment of either a real or imagined wrong or indifference. I pray that you in turn can forgive me so we can make a fresh start together as father and son and as best friends.

Please understand that you raised a son who emulated many of his father's qualities. Your example made me into a mighty man. Your work ethic is something I will always admire. Your commitments to God Almighty have given me an inner strength and determination to follow God's will. Without your example, I simply could not have carried on in this life. While you may have unconsciously fed and raised a dragon inside of me, you also provided me with an example of how a proud warrior gains the strength to slay the dragon rather than be consumed by it.

I hope you fully understand the message of this letter. Dad, thank you. I love you. I hope you can see this love that a son has for his father, one that you may not have seen before. You have honored me for being a man of God, for my charity, for my dedication to truth, for selfless service, and for aspiring to be myself. Although you may honor me, it is I who honors you. I love you Dad.

Your son forever,

Max

A unique proposal for true marriage.

Where did "gay rights" go wrong?

Once again, a homofascist explains why he must violate the rights of parents who don't support the sexual activities of the glbt community. Once again, any disagreement with the gay lifestyle is falsely labeled as "hate." I don't get it. I can figure out how to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying any sexual orientation. How come gay "activists" can't?

I think that this mindset is how the glbt community is going to loose credibility in the eyes of those that are undecided concerning the normalcy of homosexuality. Going after children behind the backs of their parents concerning sexual activity is absolutely evil.

"Gender Spectrum" in your rectum.

Under the cloak of anti-bullying (which can be taught without violating the civil rights of Christian parents and glorifying homosexuality), these children were exposed to anti-hetero propaganda, WITHOUT the consent of their parents. This is what the vast majority of the glbt community wants. Teaching children that gender is a "spectrum."

Original info here.

Scott Rose vs. parental rights.

Just about two days ago, I stumbled across this web page and found a fellow heteroactivist under attack. I decided to wade into this fray and test one of my Achilles questions against his most eloquent attacker.

I asked Mr. Scott Rose...

Do you support how some sex education classes for grades K thru 6 welcome schoolchildren INTO the glbt community WITHOUT the consent or knowledge of that child’s parents?

His response was...

"Enlightened human beings of whatever sexual orientation constantly interrelate with one another, as sexual relations are far from being the only thing of importance in life. For example, a heterosexual man with an interest in sailing could very well go out on a lake one day in a sailboat with a lesbian couple and the lesbian couple's children. The way you have phrased your question, Carl Rowan Morris, conspicuously implies that LGBT adults around children in the ages of K through 6th grade would commit child rape on those children. The direct evidence suggests that Catholic priests are far more likely that non-priest LGBT adults to rape children. Anti-gay bigot adults, on the other hand, absolutely should not be permitted to endanger their children's welfare by teaching them irrational anti-gay hate. The children taught that hate by their parents are the ones who become anti-gay bullies in school. That bullying besides damaging the gay victims also hinders the bully from receiving the best possible education. So to answer your question, yes, it is terrible for anti-gay bigot parents to hinder their offsprings' enlightened integration into the contemporary world by teaching them homophobia, the irrational fear of gay human beings, which you have expressed with your stupid question."

Mr Rose's is so fancy and so eloquent as he accuses me of implying child rape, WHILE he admits his support of violating the civil rights of parents that won't support the sexual actions of the glbt community. He calls speaking to a child about ENTERING the gay community, behind the backs of that child's parents, an "enlightened integration into the contemporary world."

Wow. That was some of the smoothest poison I've ever heard.

Isn't Mr. Scott Rose himself guilty of bigotry when he openly advocates the violation of another person's civil rights after he labels that person an "anti-gay bigot"? Isn't it possible to teach kids not to bully each other without glorifying homosexuality? Does Mr. Rose hate those who don't support the concept of a man having sex with another man (anti-gay bigotry according to him) so much that he advocates taking their children away from them? Look at the paragraph marked May 27th at 3:17pm. How will he respond to my question..."How are you better than "anti-gay bigots" when you openly admit your support of violating a parent's right to supervise their child's education?

Again, my evidence is here.

The gay mouse that roared.

I'm stunned by the clarity and quality of this article written by an ex-gay man.

Viral video report.

More gender denial.

Well. Here it is again. People denying the obvious differences between the human male and the human female. American culture is taking yet another step away from sexual sanity and teaching children that they are the gender that they think they are, regardless of what's between their legs.

Where do I buy stock in a company that provides materials and curriculum for homeschooling because, when more people find out about what's being taught to their kids, homeschooling is going to explode.

"Genderealist"

Just like I constructed the word "heteroseparatist" to free those who embrace sexual normalcy from being marginalized, I created the word "genderealist" to counteract the derisive term "heterosexist." (How crazy are human beings going to become in my lifetime?!)

A couple in Canada are refusing to tell anyone the gender of their child. Wow. Okay.

Now, these people have every right to withhold this information from people, and I'm not disputing their parental rights to do so, but why would they do this? Is this the kind of World that gays, feminists, and liberals want? Is ignoring gender the tie that binds the gays and the feminists? What's next? Will I be thrown in jail for saying "Miss" or "Sir" in the future? Am I going to live the life of Harrison Bergeron?

Story here and here.

Voters of Minnesota to be heard in 2012.

How does the 6,000+ year-old definition of marriage violate the civil rights of gay people? I don't get it. Every member of the glbt community in the United States of America grew up in a country where marriage is defined as being between one man and one woman, yet now gays are claiming/believing that such a definition is a violation of their civil rights. What? What did you say? You're equating your sexual behavior to race? Waaaa? Are you crazy!

Now, the people of Minnesota get to vote on a Constitutional amendment that defines marriage. How could anybody be upset at that? Story here, here and here.

"Don't say gay" to gradeschoolers.

Whenever I ask someone who belongs to the glbt community to denounce how some in the gay community want to speak to children about entering their lifestyle, without the consent of that child's parents, they almost always go ballistic.

Then they come at me with an avalanche of propaganda designed to distract me from the fact that they won't disavow the glbt violation of the civil rights of some parents. How odd. How strange. It seems that homopocrisy runs very deep. How did I wake up in a country where a person would openly admit their desire to pull children into homosexuality? If a person is born gay, they will still be gay when they are 18, so why do some gays insist on access to children without parental consent?

Well. It looks like Tennessee is waking up to reality and taking a stand against those who would come at children behind the backs of their parents about sexual matters. How could any sane person have a problem with that? Doesn't a person prove that they are a danger to children when they support doing an end-run around the civil rights of that child's parents? WHO CAN DISPUTE THAT?

Story here.

Hatred FROM the glbt community.

I don't know much about this guy, but he speaks with great clarity. I hear so much propaganda that I'm now at a point where I'm almost shocked by clarity. Though I walk through the valley of homofascism, I shall not fear, for I am with the Lord.

"Transgendered"

99.99% of human beings are born male or female. (Then there are the Caster Semenya types of the World.) Some people reject their own genital and decide that they want to go from male to female or vice versa. This decision is a rejection of sexual sanity and a clear indication of gross parental failure. One of the greatest current examples of this is Chaz Bono, who just doesn't want to be a girl anymore.

Yesterday I found an article that stunned me with its clarity and courage. And, it was written by a psychiatrist (which should silence my recent batch of homofascist hecklers). Dr. Keith Ablow's article is here.

Dear "Voice of Reason."

Dear Voice of Reason, (VoR for short) I've seen your last two comments and I've decided to clear up a matter before I accept any more of your posts. I think that I've figured out something about you.

Because of my experiences with comments about my posts, I've developed a process of figuring out key pieces of information by formulating a key question.

I must preface my question to you with the following statement; I hereby denounce speaking to any child about the Lord Jesus Christ and I denounce recruiting children into the heterosexual lifestyle, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

Now. That being said. VoR, can you match me by stating that you won't support gays that wish to tell children that joining the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the knowledge or consent of that child's parents? Because if you can't, that will tell me how far your support for the glbt community goes.

I know how some people like to throw up a smoke screen when they're dodging a simple question so I'll make it clear that I'm not talking about the mere mention of the existence of homosexuals in the anti-bullying classes taught to schoolkids. I'm specifically talking about those in the gay community that wouldn't hesitate to tell a child that entering the glbt community is okay, WITHOUT the consent of that child's parents.

So, Voice of Reason, this is the question I'm presenting to you. Will you denounce how some adults in the glbt community will tell a child/person under the age of 16, that it okay for them to BE gay, WITHOUT the consent of their parents?

You like true marriage? Your fired!

I haven't heard of anyone being fired for supporting the redefinition of marriage, yet I do hear of people being fired and harassed for supporting God's definition of marriage as being between one man and one woman.

Oh but wait! It's Canada where homofascism was legitimized by legalizing same-sex "marriage." The members of the glbt community want me to believe that legalizing homosexual "marriage" in my country won't affect my marriage, and then I read this. If I'm fired for standing for true marriage, won't that adversely effect mine?

Child-endangering-homofascism.

When I first started this blog, I thought that nobody would believe me if I said that the glbt community was after children. My plan was to simply gather evidence to support my point whenever my heteroseparatist philosophy was challenged. But, even when I present the facts of homofascist behavior, there are still those that refuse to accept the horror of the doctrine of the gay community; the pursuit of the minds and hearts of children, WITHOUT the consent of their parents.

I guess I was naive to think that those who supported the glbt community, beyond the understandable point of standing against the bullying of gays, would be shocked back into reality when I showed how some/most gays would go so far as to pursue children with the full knowledge that that child's parents did NOT want their child being taught that homosexuality was okay.

But yesterday, I found the second greatest example of child-endangering-homofascism that I've ever seen. I read it three times to make sure I wasn't hallucinating. Read how this homosexual homofascist plans to proudly and knowingly violate the civil rights of parents by approaching children about homosexuality without parental consent. He even supports raising boys to have sex with men when they grow up! I wonder at what age he considers a boy old enough to have sex with?

"...I for one certainly want tons of school children to learn that it’s OK to be gay, that people of the same sex should be allowed to legally marry each other, and that anyone can kiss a person of the same sex without feeling like a freak. And I would very much like for many of these young boys to grow up and start f****** men. I want lots of young ladies to develop into young women who voraciously ***** ***. I want this just as badly as many parents want their own kids to grow up ********** to trade proteins and forcefully excrete a baby. .."

Story here, here, and here.

The Peter Vidmar case.

How does gay "marriage" affect mine? I could get fired for supporting true marriage. Story here and (as of 17 May 2011) here.

Hero reporter Daniel Miller.

I just had to post this.

Long, but interesting, pro-hetero video.

Homofascists are bullying the Boy Scouts.

Gay is behavior, not race. To swap out the word,"Black" for "gay" is wrong because the color of a person's skin is morally benign and a person's sexual conduct is never morally benign.

The Boy Scouts acknowledge God and his laws. Boy Scouts are; trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. I memorized these twelve words, in this sequence, over 38 years ago.

A person cannot embrace sexual sin and be reverent. Therefore, all those who wish to embrace sexual sin cannot be a part of the BSA. Leave it to anti-Christ, "gay activists," to want to destroy the Boy Scouts of America for their reverence for God's laws.

Story here.